Scholarlink

<p>We consider three models of governance to improve upon our present governance of climate change: Polycentricity associated with Nobel prize winner Elinor Ostrom; Experimentalist Governance associated with Bob Keohane, Charles Sabel, and David Victor; and the Viable System Model associated with Stafford Beer. We first consider governance itself versus government. We then explain each model, its origins, and rationale. Finally, by combining the strengths of each model, we synthesise a combined model that might be able to improve on each taken separately, on the present model, and be applicable to climate change.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Climate Change and Three Models of Governance to Deal with it: Polycentricity, Experimentalist, and the Viable System Model

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年8月1日

查看全文
  • Brian Lederer,
  • Jon Walker,
  • Ed van der Winden

摘要

We consider three models of governance to improve upon our present governance of climate change: Polycentricity associated with Nobel prize winner Elinor Ostrom; Experimentalist Governance associated with Bob Keohane, Charles Sabel, and David Victor; and the Viable System Model associated with Stafford Beer. We first consider governance itself versus government. We then explain each model, its origins, and rationale. Finally, by combining the strengths of each model, we synthesise a combined model that might be able to improve on each taken separately, on the present model, and be applicable to climate change.