Scholarlink

<p>We introduce the concept of entrepreneur political ideology divergence, defined as the absolute ideological distance between an entrepreneur’s political ideology and that of the respective state governance. Building on organizational research on political ideology and strategic risk management reasoning, we argue that political ideology divergence heightens entrepreneurs’ perceptions of regime uncertainty and legitimacy threats, prompting entrepreneurial firm-level responses. Specifically, we theorize and find that entrepreneurial firm engagement in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices functions as a strategic outcome, that is, a response entrepreneurs use to manage political ideology divergence. Using longitudinal data on 605 entrepreneur-led firms operating in the United States (U.S.) from 2010 to 2020, we find that greater political ideology divergence is associated with increased entrepreneurial firm engagement in ESG practices. We also find that entrepreneurs moderate this relationship by deploying complementary strategies, namely, using research and development (R&amp;D) investment and lobbying to manage political divergence, thereby attenuating entrepreneurial firm engagement in ESG practices. This study contributes to research on the political economy of entrepreneurship by shifting attention from institutional constraints to entrepreneurial agency when exploring how entrepreneurs interpret and strategically respond to political ideology divergence.&#xa0;</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Navigating the political climate: the impact of political ideology divergence on ESG

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月1日

查看全文
  • Ileana Maldonado-Bautista,
  • Peter G. Klein,
  • Huiqing Ju

摘要

We introduce the concept of entrepreneur political ideology divergence, defined as the absolute ideological distance between an entrepreneur’s political ideology and that of the respective state governance. Building on organizational research on political ideology and strategic risk management reasoning, we argue that political ideology divergence heightens entrepreneurs’ perceptions of regime uncertainty and legitimacy threats, prompting entrepreneurial firm-level responses. Specifically, we theorize and find that entrepreneurial firm engagement in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices functions as a strategic outcome, that is, a response entrepreneurs use to manage political ideology divergence. Using longitudinal data on 605 entrepreneur-led firms operating in the United States (U.S.) from 2010 to 2020, we find that greater political ideology divergence is associated with increased entrepreneurial firm engagement in ESG practices. We also find that entrepreneurs moderate this relationship by deploying complementary strategies, namely, using research and development (R&D) investment and lobbying to manage political divergence, thereby attenuating entrepreneurial firm engagement in ESG practices. This study contributes to research on the political economy of entrepreneurship by shifting attention from institutional constraints to entrepreneurial agency when exploring how entrepreneurs interpret and strategically respond to political ideology divergence.