Scholarlink

<p>While research and development (R&amp;D) spillovers have long been a central argument for the public support of private R&amp;D activities, less is known about the existence and magnitude of innovation policy-induced spillovers. This paper presents a quasi-experimental analysis of the spillover effects of Eurostars R&amp;D subsidies granted to small- and medium-sized firms (SMEs) from 2008 to 2019. We measure spillover effects by relying on employee mobility either between established firms or into employee entrepreneurship. We employ a combination of regression discontinuity (RD) design and difference-in-differences (DiD) methods for causal identification. We find no significant difference in the rate of spinoff creation between subsidized and nonsubsidized firms. However, our findings confirm that spinoffs of subsidized firms have higher rates of survival and employment growth than their counterparts. We also find that the SMEs that hire former employees of subsidized firms perform better in terms of employment, turnover, and value added than do similar firms that hire employees from nonsubsidized firms. We discuss the implications for innovation and labor market policies.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Indirect effects of R&D subsidies: labor mobility as a channel for knowledge spillovers

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年4月5日

查看全文
  • Abdulaziz Reshid,
  • Erik Hegelund,
  • Peter Svensson

摘要

While research and development (R&D) spillovers have long been a central argument for the public support of private R&D activities, less is known about the existence and magnitude of innovation policy-induced spillovers. This paper presents a quasi-experimental analysis of the spillover effects of Eurostars R&D subsidies granted to small- and medium-sized firms (SMEs) from 2008 to 2019. We measure spillover effects by relying on employee mobility either between established firms or into employee entrepreneurship. We employ a combination of regression discontinuity (RD) design and difference-in-differences (DiD) methods for causal identification. We find no significant difference in the rate of spinoff creation between subsidized and nonsubsidized firms. However, our findings confirm that spinoffs of subsidized firms have higher rates of survival and employment growth than their counterparts. We also find that the SMEs that hire former employees of subsidized firms perform better in terms of employment, turnover, and value added than do similar firms that hire employees from nonsubsidized firms. We discuss the implications for innovation and labor market policies.