Scholarlink

<p>I discuss a novel strategy for blocking Bradleyan regresses that utilizes grounding claims for claims of the form <i>aRb</i> that include themselves within the claimed grounds. Such grounding claims act as regress blockers in the sense that raising the question <i>why</i> <i>aRb</i>, <i>given</i> the claimed grounds that include the grounding claim itself, entails either outright inconsistency – if the grounding claim concerns full grounds for <i>aRb</i> – or pragmatic infelicity – if the grounding claim concerns only partial grounds for <i>aRb</i>.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Blocking Bradley

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月23日

查看全文
  • Ori Simchen

摘要

I discuss a novel strategy for blocking Bradleyan regresses that utilizes grounding claims for claims of the form aRb that include themselves within the claimed grounds. Such grounding claims act as regress blockers in the sense that raising the question why aRb, given the claimed grounds that include the grounding claim itself, entails either outright inconsistency – if the grounding claim concerns full grounds for aRb – or pragmatic infelicity – if the grounding claim concerns only partial grounds for aRb.