Scholarlink

<p>In their 2016 ‘Taking a Chance on KK’, Jeremy Goodman and Bernhard Salow offer an interesting epistemic model that validates KK. The springboard for my discussion will be a mistake in their presentation, one that points to a real problem with the model. My remarks will have a broad interest, since certain of the key examples point to intriguing questions concerning the epistemic contours of testimony and memory. I'll also raise instructive difficulties for a theoretically important weakening of the JTB treatment of knowledge.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Normality and KK

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月7日

查看全文
  • John Hawthorne

摘要

In their 2016 ‘Taking a Chance on KK’, Jeremy Goodman and Bernhard Salow offer an interesting epistemic model that validates KK. The springboard for my discussion will be a mistake in their presentation, one that points to a real problem with the model. My remarks will have a broad interest, since certain of the key examples point to intriguing questions concerning the epistemic contours of testimony and memory. I'll also raise instructive difficulties for a theoretically important weakening of the JTB treatment of knowledge.