Introduction <p>Community pharmacists (CPs) are pivotal in the management of drug-related problems (DRPs), yet a need for additional training has been recognized.</p> Aim <p>The aim was to develop and evaluate an e-learning program to enhance pharmacists’ ability to detect and manage DRPs.</p> Method <p>The e-learning program provided a self-paced learning experience with 10 modules, each focusing on a DRP. The DRPs were chosen as part of a previous Delphi consensus study. The development team, consisting of researchers, clinical pharmacists, and CPs, considered DRPs applicable if they occurred frequently and could be solved in a pharmacy. Moreover, a predefined checklist was established to guide the development of new modules and specify quality standards. Each module was structured into an educational phase (tutorials, pre- and post-knowledge quizzes, in-depth exercises), and a practical phase (documentation of anonymized patient encounters). After completing all modules, participants took a final comprehensive quiz with 2 questions per module (in total 20 questions). The program was evaluated on multiple levels: pharmacists’ knowledge change, how they implemented this knowledge in practice, and their feedback. Data were analyzed descriptively. Comparison between the quizzes were calculated using the Wilcoxon test.</p> Results <p>A total of 203 pharmacists registered to participate in the study, with participation declining across modules (184 participants completed Module&#xa0;1&#xa0;pre-knowledge quiz vs. 119 in Module 10). Across all modules, a significant knowledge increase was observed when comparing pre- and post-knowledge-quizzes (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Knowledge levels remained high in the final quiz (on average 1.63 ± 0.61 correct answers). Participants documented 13,778&#xa0;patient encounters, thereof 5073 encounters with at least one DRP. According to the participants, most of the DRPs (90.1%, n = 4550) could be resolved. A total of 1137&#xa0;feedbacks were received. Overall, feedback was positive, with participants highlighting improved abilities to engage with patients (85.2%, n = 969) and to identify DRPs (82.0%, n = 629).</p> Conclusion <p>By bridging the gap between theoretical learning and practical application, this e-learning program improves pharmacists’ skills in DRP management.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Development and evaluation of an e-learning program on drug-related problems for community pharmacists

  • Cathrin J. Vogt,
  • Alesia Reuther,
  • Viktoria S. Wurmbach,
  • Marina Weißenborn,
  • Janina A. Bittmann,
  • Katharina Wien,
  • Anette Lampert,
  • Emilia Maria Boček Eknes,
  • Patrick Schäfer,
  • Hanna M. Seidling

摘要

Introduction

Community pharmacists (CPs) are pivotal in the management of drug-related problems (DRPs), yet a need for additional training has been recognized.

Aim

The aim was to develop and evaluate an e-learning program to enhance pharmacists’ ability to detect and manage DRPs.

Method

The e-learning program provided a self-paced learning experience with 10 modules, each focusing on a DRP. The DRPs were chosen as part of a previous Delphi consensus study. The development team, consisting of researchers, clinical pharmacists, and CPs, considered DRPs applicable if they occurred frequently and could be solved in a pharmacy. Moreover, a predefined checklist was established to guide the development of new modules and specify quality standards. Each module was structured into an educational phase (tutorials, pre- and post-knowledge quizzes, in-depth exercises), and a practical phase (documentation of anonymized patient encounters). After completing all modules, participants took a final comprehensive quiz with 2 questions per module (in total 20 questions). The program was evaluated on multiple levels: pharmacists’ knowledge change, how they implemented this knowledge in practice, and their feedback. Data were analyzed descriptively. Comparison between the quizzes were calculated using the Wilcoxon test.

Results

A total of 203 pharmacists registered to participate in the study, with participation declining across modules (184 participants completed Module 1 pre-knowledge quiz vs. 119 in Module 10). Across all modules, a significant knowledge increase was observed when comparing pre- and post-knowledge-quizzes (p < 0.001). Knowledge levels remained high in the final quiz (on average 1.63 ± 0.61 correct answers). Participants documented 13,778 patient encounters, thereof 5073 encounters with at least one DRP. According to the participants, most of the DRPs (90.1%, n = 4550) could be resolved. A total of 1137 feedbacks were received. Overall, feedback was positive, with participants highlighting improved abilities to engage with patients (85.2%, n = 969) and to identify DRPs (82.0%, n = 629).

Conclusion

By bridging the gap between theoretical learning and practical application, this e-learning program improves pharmacists’ skills in DRP management.