<p>This work examines how to estimate an effective O(<sup>3</sup>P) surface recombination probability <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\gamma _\textrm{O}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> in CO<sub>2</sub> plasmas in Pyrex from the temporal evolution of its density, measured in modulated current conditions in DC glow discharges. Zero-dimensional simulations are used under steady-state and current modulation conditions to analyse experimental data available for pressures in the range 0.2–5 Torr and currents between 10 and 50&#xa0;mA. It is shown that the estimation of <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\gamma _\textrm{O}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is simpler in CO<sub>2</sub> than in O<sub>2</sub>, as in the former case it can be realistically estimated by assuming that the net losses of O(<sup>3</sup>P) correspond to surface recombination losses only, while in the latter case volume recombination and flow losses have to be additionally taken into account. The main reason for this difference is the lower fraction of oxygen species in CO<sub>2</sub> plasmas, leading to much lower volume recombination rates.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Assessing the Role of Surface and Volume Processes for Atomic Oxygen Losses in CO2 Glow Discharges in Pyrex

  • Pedro Viegas,
  • Blandine Berdugo,
  • Vasco Guerra

摘要

This work examines how to estimate an effective O(3P) surface recombination probability \(\gamma _\textrm{O}\) in CO2 plasmas in Pyrex from the temporal evolution of its density, measured in modulated current conditions in DC glow discharges. Zero-dimensional simulations are used under steady-state and current modulation conditions to analyse experimental data available for pressures in the range 0.2–5 Torr and currents between 10 and 50 mA. It is shown that the estimation of \(\gamma _\textrm{O}\) is simpler in CO2 than in O2, as in the former case it can be realistically estimated by assuming that the net losses of O(3P) correspond to surface recombination losses only, while in the latter case volume recombination and flow losses have to be additionally taken into account. The main reason for this difference is the lower fraction of oxygen species in CO2 plasmas, leading to much lower volume recombination rates.