<p>This study mainly focuses on the effect of small amount additions of Eu<sup>3+</sup> in substitution for Y<sup>3+</sup> on the thermal conductivity of YSZ TBCs, and the evaluation of coatings resistance to severe thermal shock cycles. Eu<sup>3+</sup> doped and undoped YSZ coatings were prepared by APS method. Thermal conductivity of the two coatings was measured and both types of coatings were subjected to thermal shock condition under a steady propane flame at 1100&#xa0;°C. Results showed that thermal conductivity of the YSZ:Eu coating is 10–19% lower than that of the YSZ coating at the same temperature, indicating that only 2&#xa0;mol% Eu<sup>3+</sup> doping can effectively reduce the thermal conductivity of the YSZ TBCs. For the same treatment conditions, the interfacial fracture toughness of the YSZ:Eu coating is slightly higher than that of the YSZ coating and the TGO thickness is thinner, indicating that 2&#xa0;mol% Eu<sup>3+</sup> doping is prone to inhibit the growth of TGO and improve the coating’s interfacial properties. Comparison between flame thermal shock and furnace isothermal / cyclic oxidation treatment confirmed that flame thermal shock is a more severe and destructive treatment as it results in higher densities of micro-cracks and pores within the TGO, thus inducing a lower interfacial fracture toughness value.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Effect of Eu3+ Doping on the Interfacial Fracture Toughness of Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Thermal Barrier Coatings in Flame Thermal Shock Condition

  • Yankuan Liu,
  • Etienne Copin,
  • Liping Yang,
  • Sandrine Duluard,
  • Florence Ansart,
  • Philippe Lours,
  • Zhiping Wang

摘要

This study mainly focuses on the effect of small amount additions of Eu3+ in substitution for Y3+ on the thermal conductivity of YSZ TBCs, and the evaluation of coatings resistance to severe thermal shock cycles. Eu3+ doped and undoped YSZ coatings were prepared by APS method. Thermal conductivity of the two coatings was measured and both types of coatings were subjected to thermal shock condition under a steady propane flame at 1100 °C. Results showed that thermal conductivity of the YSZ:Eu coating is 10–19% lower than that of the YSZ coating at the same temperature, indicating that only 2 mol% Eu3+ doping can effectively reduce the thermal conductivity of the YSZ TBCs. For the same treatment conditions, the interfacial fracture toughness of the YSZ:Eu coating is slightly higher than that of the YSZ coating and the TGO thickness is thinner, indicating that 2 mol% Eu3+ doping is prone to inhibit the growth of TGO and improve the coating’s interfacial properties. Comparison between flame thermal shock and furnace isothermal / cyclic oxidation treatment confirmed that flame thermal shock is a more severe and destructive treatment as it results in higher densities of micro-cracks and pores within the TGO, thus inducing a lower interfacial fracture toughness value.