<p>NFTs or non-fungible tokens are digital assets stored on a blockchain. They can be traded or exchanged for money, cryptocurrencies or other NFTs. Examples include works of art and digital or other tokenised collectables. An important determinant of price for collectables is rarity within a collection. Many trading platforms offer to rank items in terms of rarity but rankings differ considerably and, often, little explanation is given of the methods used. This paper provides a mathematical framework for the analysis of a comprehensive class of collections. It examines individual and joint distributions of attributes over such collections, and shows how these can be combined to provide a rarity ranking for all items in the collection. There is, however, only a limited range of methods that give consistent results over different collections. These are identified as belonging to a one-parameter family of ranking functions. Each gives to every item of a collection a rarity score that is directly comparable between collections. Despite taking account of all possible combinations of attributes when ranking, the method is nonetheless computationally feasible.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Rarity Rankings of NFTs and Other Collectables

  • Peter M. Williams

摘要

NFTs or non-fungible tokens are digital assets stored on a blockchain. They can be traded or exchanged for money, cryptocurrencies or other NFTs. Examples include works of art and digital or other tokenised collectables. An important determinant of price for collectables is rarity within a collection. Many trading platforms offer to rank items in terms of rarity but rankings differ considerably and, often, little explanation is given of the methods used. This paper provides a mathematical framework for the analysis of a comprehensive class of collections. It examines individual and joint distributions of attributes over such collections, and shows how these can be combined to provide a rarity ranking for all items in the collection. There is, however, only a limited range of methods that give consistent results over different collections. These are identified as belonging to a one-parameter family of ranking functions. Each gives to every item of a collection a rarity score that is directly comparable between collections. Despite taking account of all possible combinations of attributes when ranking, the method is nonetheless computationally feasible.