Scholarlink

<p>Legislation shapes every aspect of public life and stands at the core of governance. Despite sustained attention on a variety of aspects of legislation, we still lack a comprehensive and integrated framework of legislative design. To address this gap, we introduce a novel conceptual framework that analyzes legislative design along two dimensions—<i>versatility</i> and <i>precision</i>—using six indicators: objects, subjects, instruments, dilution, derogation, and delegation. Taken together, these two dimensions offer four ideal types of legislative design which we conceptualize using the metaphor of blades. Some laws resemble Swiss army knives, highly versatile and precise; others are scalpels, precise but narrowly scoped; machetes are versatile but imprecise; and scythes are imprecise but focused. We demonstrate the validity of our framework by applying it to environmental and macroprudential legislation in the European Union, identifying laws that approximate each ideal type. By focusing on the internal architecture of legislation, our framework offers a tool to comparatively analyze legislative design across policy domains, institutional settings, and time.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Laws as blades: A conceptual framework of legislative design

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月11日

查看全文
  • Steffen Hurka,
  • Stefanie Rueß,
  • Mike Cowburn,
  • Constantin Kaplaner

摘要

Legislation shapes every aspect of public life and stands at the core of governance. Despite sustained attention on a variety of aspects of legislation, we still lack a comprehensive and integrated framework of legislative design. To address this gap, we introduce a novel conceptual framework that analyzes legislative design along two dimensions—versatility and precision—using six indicators: objects, subjects, instruments, dilution, derogation, and delegation. Taken together, these two dimensions offer four ideal types of legislative design which we conceptualize using the metaphor of blades. Some laws resemble Swiss army knives, highly versatile and precise; others are scalpels, precise but narrowly scoped; machetes are versatile but imprecise; and scythes are imprecise but focused. We demonstrate the validity of our framework by applying it to environmental and macroprudential legislation in the European Union, identifying laws that approximate each ideal type. By focusing on the internal architecture of legislation, our framework offers a tool to comparatively analyze legislative design across policy domains, institutional settings, and time.