<p>The nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation admits a wide range of localized wave structures, including bright and dark solitons, breathers, and rogue waves. Such localized structures are challenging for physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to resolve accurately because the relevant solution structure often occupies only a small fraction of the spacetime domain, making collocation-point placement a key factor in training quality. To address this issue, we propose GRAVIS (Gradient-Residual Adaptive Variance-based Importance Sampling), a dual-criterion adaptive collocation framework that combines residual magnitude with the output-layer gradient norm of the per-point residual loss, using the latter as a proxy for parameter-space sensitivity. The resulting score is converted into a smooth sampling distribution via a tempered Gaussian mixture model (GMM), supplemented by scheduled exploration and importance-corrected training. We evaluate the method on seven NLS-type benchmarks, including bright and dark solitons, a breather, first- and second-order rogue waves, and two (2+1)-dimensional extensions, under matched network architectures and training budgets. Under the matched architectures and training budgets used in this study, GRAVIS attains the lowest relative L<sup>2</sup> error among the evaluated sampling strategies on all seven benchmarks, with improvement factors of 1.56<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\times \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>×</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> to 2.37<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\times \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>×</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> over residual-based adaptive distribution (RAD) and up to 36.4<InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\times \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>×</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> over uniform sampling. The largest gains occur for strongly localized and oscillatory solutions, where residual magnitude alone is less effective at distinguishing among collocation points with different optimization relevance.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Physics-informed neural networks for nonlinear Schrödinger localized wave problems with gradient-residual adaptive collocation sampling

  • Long Chen,
  • Fan Liu,
  • Yongming Zhang,
  • Weiqi Chen

摘要

The nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation admits a wide range of localized wave structures, including bright and dark solitons, breathers, and rogue waves. Such localized structures are challenging for physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to resolve accurately because the relevant solution structure often occupies only a small fraction of the spacetime domain, making collocation-point placement a key factor in training quality. To address this issue, we propose GRAVIS (Gradient-Residual Adaptive Variance-based Importance Sampling), a dual-criterion adaptive collocation framework that combines residual magnitude with the output-layer gradient norm of the per-point residual loss, using the latter as a proxy for parameter-space sensitivity. The resulting score is converted into a smooth sampling distribution via a tempered Gaussian mixture model (GMM), supplemented by scheduled exploration and importance-corrected training. We evaluate the method on seven NLS-type benchmarks, including bright and dark solitons, a breather, first- and second-order rogue waves, and two (2+1)-dimensional extensions, under matched network architectures and training budgets. Under the matched architectures and training budgets used in this study, GRAVIS attains the lowest relative L2 error among the evaluated sampling strategies on all seven benchmarks, with improvement factors of 1.56 \(\times \) × to 2.37 \(\times \) × over residual-based adaptive distribution (RAD) and up to 36.4 \(\times \) × over uniform sampling. The largest gains occur for strongly localized and oscillatory solutions, where residual magnitude alone is less effective at distinguishing among collocation points with different optimization relevance.