Scholarlink

<p>The concept of regional economic resilience (RER) is still attracting interest among researchers and practitioners, sustained by current geopolitical instability and overlapping multiple shocks worldwide. Despite a very large number of scientific and policy works, including diverse literature reviews, that have investigated the field from different perspectives, network-based systematic evidence on RER publications remains incomplete. By adopting a spatial empirical perspective, and applying scientometric-based analytical tools, this paper provides novel evidence on the network features of resilience studies published in the last two decades. Results point out the occurrence and extent of specific network interactions among authors, countries, journals of publications. Our findings are also informative on the key empirical approaches dealing with RER. The empirics contribute to the debate surrounding the conceptual development of RER and provide guidance to scholars and policymakers employing the RER framework.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Network and Spatial Interactions in Regional Economic Resilience Studies: A Scientometric Analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月3日

查看全文
  • Paolo Di Caro,
  • Paolo Lorenzo Ferrara,
  • Gianpiero Torrisi

摘要

The concept of regional economic resilience (RER) is still attracting interest among researchers and practitioners, sustained by current geopolitical instability and overlapping multiple shocks worldwide. Despite a very large number of scientific and policy works, including diverse literature reviews, that have investigated the field from different perspectives, network-based systematic evidence on RER publications remains incomplete. By adopting a spatial empirical perspective, and applying scientometric-based analytical tools, this paper provides novel evidence on the network features of resilience studies published in the last two decades. Results point out the occurrence and extent of specific network interactions among authors, countries, journals of publications. Our findings are also informative on the key empirical approaches dealing with RER. The empirics contribute to the debate surrounding the conceptual development of RER and provide guidance to scholars and policymakers employing the RER framework.