Scholarlink

Purpose <p>Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive primary brain tumor with poor overall survival. Patients living in rural areas have worse outcomes than those in metropolitan regions, but the effect of distance from subspecialty care on survival and clinical trial participation remains unclear. We evaluated the association between distance to a National Cancer Institute–designated Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) and overall survival (OS) and clinical trial enrollment in patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type GBM.</p> Methods <p>We retrospectively identified patients with newly diagnosed isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type GBM (2021 World Health Organization classification) who received treatment at our CCC (2018–2022). Distance from the CCC was analyzed as both categorical and continuous variables. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were performed, adjusting for established prognostic factors.</p> Results <p>The 167 patients had similar baseline characteristics across distance groups. In univariable analyses, no significant difference in OS was observed between patients living near the CCC and those at intermediate or far distances. In multivariable analysis, patients in the intermediate-distance group demonstrated significantly worse OS compared with the near group (hazard ratio 1.61, 95% confidence interval 1.03, 2.50, <i>p</i> = 0.035). Increasing distance was associated with significantly lower clinical trial enrollment (near 43%, intermediate 35%, and far 18%; <i>p</i> = 0.0001).</p> Conclusions <p>Distance from a CCC was associated with disparities in survival and access to clinical trials among patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type GBM. Given that clinical trials represent a standard-of-care option for GBM, strategies to improve access to subspecialty care and trial participation are needed to reduce outcome disparities.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The impact of distance in treating glioblastoma: a retrospective single-center study

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月9日

查看全文
  • Samantha Mohl,
  • Samuel A. Tenhoeve,
  • Scott King,
  • Yuxin Zhao,
  • Y. Ann Chen,
  • Joe Mendez,
  • Rachna Malani

摘要

Purpose

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive primary brain tumor with poor overall survival. Patients living in rural areas have worse outcomes than those in metropolitan regions, but the effect of distance from subspecialty care on survival and clinical trial participation remains unclear. We evaluated the association between distance to a National Cancer Institute–designated Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) and overall survival (OS) and clinical trial enrollment in patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type GBM.

Methods

We retrospectively identified patients with newly diagnosed isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type GBM (2021 World Health Organization classification) who received treatment at our CCC (2018–2022). Distance from the CCC was analyzed as both categorical and continuous variables. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were performed, adjusting for established prognostic factors.

Results

The 167 patients had similar baseline characteristics across distance groups. In univariable analyses, no significant difference in OS was observed between patients living near the CCC and those at intermediate or far distances. In multivariable analysis, patients in the intermediate-distance group demonstrated significantly worse OS compared with the near group (hazard ratio 1.61, 95% confidence interval 1.03, 2.50, p = 0.035). Increasing distance was associated with significantly lower clinical trial enrollment (near 43%, intermediate 35%, and far 18%; p = 0.0001).

Conclusions

Distance from a CCC was associated with disparities in survival and access to clinical trials among patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type GBM. Given that clinical trials represent a standard-of-care option for GBM, strategies to improve access to subspecialty care and trial participation are needed to reduce outcome disparities.