Scholarlink

Background and objectives <p>Tumor location and its proximity to eloquent brain areas are key factors in glioma surgery decision-making. However, the absence of a consensus definition for eloquent brain areas leads to variability in surgical decision-making. This survey aimed to assess this heterogeneity in defining eloquent brain regions.</p> Methods <p>A survey was distributed among neurosurgeons in the United States, Europe, Latin America, and Australasia between February and November 2023. Respondents rated the eloquence of various brain structures on a Likert scale and reported their use of preoperative techniques. Twelve glioma and glioblastoma cases were presented to assess opinions on tumor location eloquence and preferred surgical approaches.</p> Results <p>157 neurosurgeons from 25 countries responded to the survey. Two-thirds (68%) agreed on the need for a standardized definition of eloquence, while only 23% applied existing eloquence grading scales. Eloquence ratings varied, with the highest variation reported for the corona radiata, uncinate fasciculus and superior longitudinal fasciculus. In patient cases, variability was observed at four levels of decision-making: (1) degree of eloquence; (2) preferred surgical modality; (3) use of intraoperative mapping; (4) the preferred mapping modality (asleep or awake).</p> Conclusions <p>This survey highlights the variability in defining eloquence and its impact on glioma surgery decision-making. This lack of consensus limits the reliability of eloquence as a descriptor of tumor location, affecting patient care and comparability across studies. Future research should focus on the development of an easy-to-use, objective method (based on intraoperative data) for identifying eloquent brain regions preoperatively.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Preoperative assessment of tumor eloquence and resectability: an international survey

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月21日

查看全文
  • Emma Rammeloo,
  • Jacob S. Young,
  • Joost W. Schouten,
  • Eelke M. Bos,
  • Shawn L. Hervey-Jumper,
  • Christine Jungk,
  • Sandro M. Krieg,
  • Timothy Smith,
  • Jordina Rincon-Torroella,
  • Chetan Bettegowda,
  • Takashi Maruyama,
  • Arthur Wagner,
  • Philippe Schucht,
  • Marike L. D. Broekman,
  • Steven De Vleeschouwer,
  • Brian V. Nahed,
  • Mitchel S. Berger,
  • Arnaud J. P. E. Vincent,
  • Jasper K. W. Gerritsen

摘要

Background and objectives

Tumor location and its proximity to eloquent brain areas are key factors in glioma surgery decision-making. However, the absence of a consensus definition for eloquent brain areas leads to variability in surgical decision-making. This survey aimed to assess this heterogeneity in defining eloquent brain regions.

Methods

A survey was distributed among neurosurgeons in the United States, Europe, Latin America, and Australasia between February and November 2023. Respondents rated the eloquence of various brain structures on a Likert scale and reported their use of preoperative techniques. Twelve glioma and glioblastoma cases were presented to assess opinions on tumor location eloquence and preferred surgical approaches.

Results

157 neurosurgeons from 25 countries responded to the survey. Two-thirds (68%) agreed on the need for a standardized definition of eloquence, while only 23% applied existing eloquence grading scales. Eloquence ratings varied, with the highest variation reported for the corona radiata, uncinate fasciculus and superior longitudinal fasciculus. In patient cases, variability was observed at four levels of decision-making: (1) degree of eloquence; (2) preferred surgical modality; (3) use of intraoperative mapping; (4) the preferred mapping modality (asleep or awake).

Conclusions

This survey highlights the variability in defining eloquence and its impact on glioma surgery decision-making. This lack of consensus limits the reliability of eloquence as a descriptor of tumor location, affecting patient care and comparability across studies. Future research should focus on the development of an easy-to-use, objective method (based on intraoperative data) for identifying eloquent brain regions preoperatively.