We welcome the opportunity to respond to Wasowicz et al.‘s (2026) critique of our recent findings on biomass accumulation in Pinus contorta (Riege et al., 2025). We share the fundamental conclusion that a balanced assessment, integrating both potential benefits and ecological effects, is necessary when considering the use of lodgepole pine in forestry, land rehabilitation and carbon sequestration. However, we contend that the response by Wasowicz et al. presents an unbalanced perspective, focusing disproportionately on perceived risks and utilizing terminology that obscures the complexity of ecosystem change and ecosystem dynamics. We contend that Riege et al. reports a more objective, evidence-based assessment of the effects and potential uses of lodgepole pine colonization.
