<p>In the framework of Husserl’s phenomenology, we can distinguish three conceptions of sedimentation: static, genetic, and generative. After briefly sketching the static and genetic conceptions, this paper offers a detailed examination of generative sedimentations, showing how present consciousness is shaped not only by its own past but also by intersubjective and intergenerational formations. It distinguishes four partially overlapping frameworks of generative sedimentations: (1) phylogenetic sedimentations, which designate inherited bodily, instinctual, and developmental potentialities; (2) generative historicity, which concerns chains of motivation springing from communal traditions and constituting an intersubjective history of sense; (3) material sedimentations, which involve the externalization, stabilization, and intergenerational transmission of meaning in enduring artifacts, such as writing; and (4) philosophical sedimentations, which concern the historical development of philosophy itself, wherein norms and tasks of rationality are instituted, sedimented, and reactivated through critique. Taken together, these four frameworks articulate complementary axes for interrogating the generative lifeworld and clarify how inherited formations function as pregiven horizons that both condition experience and call for phenomenological reactivation and transformation.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Generative phenomenology and sedimentations

  • Saulius Geniusas

摘要

In the framework of Husserl’s phenomenology, we can distinguish three conceptions of sedimentation: static, genetic, and generative. After briefly sketching the static and genetic conceptions, this paper offers a detailed examination of generative sedimentations, showing how present consciousness is shaped not only by its own past but also by intersubjective and intergenerational formations. It distinguishes four partially overlapping frameworks of generative sedimentations: (1) phylogenetic sedimentations, which designate inherited bodily, instinctual, and developmental potentialities; (2) generative historicity, which concerns chains of motivation springing from communal traditions and constituting an intersubjective history of sense; (3) material sedimentations, which involve the externalization, stabilization, and intergenerational transmission of meaning in enduring artifacts, such as writing; and (4) philosophical sedimentations, which concern the historical development of philosophy itself, wherein norms and tasks of rationality are instituted, sedimented, and reactivated through critique. Taken together, these four frameworks articulate complementary axes for interrogating the generative lifeworld and clarify how inherited formations function as pregiven horizons that both condition experience and call for phenomenological reactivation and transformation.