<p>As artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes corporate operations, its role in fostering sustainability has garnered increasing attention. This study investigates how AI application affects firms’ Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance, and how board-level demographic diversity, specifically gender and age, moderates this relationship. Drawing on panel data from 5,637 non-financial A-share listed firms in China (2014–2023), we employ fixed effects and PSM-DID models to address endogeneity. Results reveal that AI application significantly enhances ESG performance. Board gender diversity positively moderates this relationship, which underscores the strategic value of inclusive leadership. In contrast, board age diversity negatively moderates the effect, suggesting that intergenerational misalignment may hinder the effective implementation of AI-driven sustainability. Our findings are grounded in the Resource-Based View, Upper Echelons Theory and further enriched by Tokenism Theory. This study contributes to the governance literature by showing that board diversity is not uniformly beneficial, its impact varies by dimension and context. The findings highlight the need for boards aligned with technological change and support gender-inclusive governance as a lever for sustainable development.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Governance: The Moderating Role of Board Gender and Age Diversity

  • Shanshan Yue,
  • Norkhairul Hafiz Bajuri,
  • Bin Wang,
  • Husni Samara

摘要

As artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes corporate operations, its role in fostering sustainability has garnered increasing attention. This study investigates how AI application affects firms’ Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance, and how board-level demographic diversity, specifically gender and age, moderates this relationship. Drawing on panel data from 5,637 non-financial A-share listed firms in China (2014–2023), we employ fixed effects and PSM-DID models to address endogeneity. Results reveal that AI application significantly enhances ESG performance. Board gender diversity positively moderates this relationship, which underscores the strategic value of inclusive leadership. In contrast, board age diversity negatively moderates the effect, suggesting that intergenerational misalignment may hinder the effective implementation of AI-driven sustainability. Our findings are grounded in the Resource-Based View, Upper Echelons Theory and further enriched by Tokenism Theory. This study contributes to the governance literature by showing that board diversity is not uniformly beneficial, its impact varies by dimension and context. The findings highlight the need for boards aligned with technological change and support gender-inclusive governance as a lever for sustainable development.