Scholarlink

Introduction <p>Survey response rates have varied for Nevada’s administration of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) across the state. The authors evaluated whether using different logos for survey distribution would impact response rates. </p> Methods <p>Using focus groups and an online survey, we asked how participants perceived three logos (which was the most likely to be opened, most trustworthy, and must credible). </p> Results <p>Results showed that the State seal would be the mostly likely opened, but they were likely to discard it if the envelope’s contents were not official business. The University’s logo was polarizing in some areas. </p> Conclusions <p>A PRAMS-specific logo survey may be more effective, as it was seen as “inviting” and adequately described the contents of the envelope. Further research is needed to better explore the impact of logos on mail distributions for public health surveillance surveys.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The Impact of Logos on Intrastate Variation of Response Rates for the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System in Nevada

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年4月29日

查看全文
  • Randall J. Owen,
  • Lex Owen,
  • Rishab Karki

摘要

Introduction

Survey response rates have varied for Nevada’s administration of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) across the state. The authors evaluated whether using different logos for survey distribution would impact response rates.

Methods

Using focus groups and an online survey, we asked how participants perceived three logos (which was the most likely to be opened, most trustworthy, and must credible).

Results

Results showed that the State seal would be the mostly likely opened, but they were likely to discard it if the envelope’s contents were not official business. The University’s logo was polarizing in some areas.

Conclusions

A PRAMS-specific logo survey may be more effective, as it was seen as “inviting” and adequately described the contents of the envelope. Further research is needed to better explore the impact of logos on mail distributions for public health surveillance surveys.