<p>A logic <i>L</i> has the disjunction property just in case <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\models _{L} \varphi \vee \psi \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mo>⊧</mo> <mi>L</mi> </msub> <mi>φ</mi> <mo>∨</mo> <mi>ψ</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> implies <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\models _{L} \varphi \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mo>⊧</mo> <mi>L</mi> </msub> <mi>φ</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> or <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\models _{L} \psi \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mo>⊧</mo> <mi>L</mi> </msub> <mi>ψ</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. This property is important to constructivists and is a well-known feature of intuitionistic logic. In this paper we use model-theoretic techniques to show that the disjunction property holds in Urquhart’s operational relevance logics <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\textbf {R}}_U^+\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="bold">R</mi> <mi>U</mi> <mo>+</mo> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\textbf {T}}_U^+\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="bold">T</mi> <mi>U</mi> <mo>+</mo> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\textbf {RW}}_U^+\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="bold">RW</mi> <mi>U</mi> <mo>+</mo> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\textbf {TW}}_U^+\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="bold">TW</mi> <mi>U</mi> <mo>+</mo> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\textbf {E}}_U^+\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi mathvariant="bold">E</mi> <mi>U</mi> <mo>+</mo> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. These results suggest that operational relevance logics merit further attention from a constructivist perspective. Along the way, we also provide a novel proof that the disjunction property holds in intuitionistic logic.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The Disjunction Property for Operational Relevance Logics

  • Daniel West,
  • Yale Weiss

摘要

A logic L has the disjunction property just in case \(\models _{L} \varphi \vee \psi \) L φ ψ implies \(\models _{L} \varphi \) L φ or \(\models _{L} \psi \) L ψ . This property is important to constructivists and is a well-known feature of intuitionistic logic. In this paper we use model-theoretic techniques to show that the disjunction property holds in Urquhart’s operational relevance logics \({\textbf {R}}_U^+\) R U + , \({\textbf {T}}_U^+\) T U + , \({\textbf {RW}}_U^+\) RW U + , \({\textbf {TW}}_U^+\) TW U + , and \({\textbf {E}}_U^+\) E U + . These results suggest that operational relevance logics merit further attention from a constructivist perspective. Along the way, we also provide a novel proof that the disjunction property holds in intuitionistic logic.