<p>An object is gunky in virtue of how it decomposes. In particular, an object is <i>gunky</i> if and only if all its parts have proper parts. Since Anaxagoras, philosophers have appealed to the existence of gunk to support a range of metaphysical views. These discussions raise questions about the composition of gunk: How is gunk generated? How do we get gunk? Obviously, gunk cannot be composed of atoms. Otherwise, we have admitted objects into our ontology (i.e. atoms) with no proper parts. This has led to the widespread belief that gunk cannot be generated. It must be given. In this paper, we prove this to be false. Though gunk cannot be generated by atoms, we show that it can nevertheless be generated by some fundamental entities. We apply Weyl’s Equidistribution Theorem to produce a model of a universe which is gunky yet generated by a single entity. This dispels other misconceptions about gunk and provides a new perspective on debates about metaphysical fundamentality.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Generating Gunk

  • Saikeerthi Rachavelpula

摘要

An object is gunky in virtue of how it decomposes. In particular, an object is gunky if and only if all its parts have proper parts. Since Anaxagoras, philosophers have appealed to the existence of gunk to support a range of metaphysical views. These discussions raise questions about the composition of gunk: How is gunk generated? How do we get gunk? Obviously, gunk cannot be composed of atoms. Otherwise, we have admitted objects into our ontology (i.e. atoms) with no proper parts. This has led to the widespread belief that gunk cannot be generated. It must be given. In this paper, we prove this to be false. Though gunk cannot be generated by atoms, we show that it can nevertheless be generated by some fundamental entities. We apply Weyl’s Equidistribution Theorem to produce a model of a universe which is gunky yet generated by a single entity. This dispels other misconceptions about gunk and provides a new perspective on debates about metaphysical fundamentality.