Scholarlink

Context <p>Non-lethal and lethal human activities such as hunting or agricultural practices strongly shape the movement and behaviour of wildlife populations. The recent return of natural predators in parts of the world complexifies the risk landscape for prey in anthropogenic ecosystems. Disentangling the effects of human and natural predators on the ability of hunted species to navigate dynamic landscapes of risk will improve efforts to sustainably manage game species and predators in human-dominated landscapes.</p> Objectives <p>We investigated how roe deer may flexibly adjust the selection for open and forest habitats to trade-off between hunting and natural predation risk. We used a large dataset across Europe with areas with and without risk from human hunting and lynx predation, while controlling for non-lethal human disturbance using the Human Footprint Index.</p> Methods <p>We used integrated step selection analysis at diel and seasonal temporal scales to investigate selection of open vs. forest habitats across sites differing in the occurrence and timing of the hunting season, presence of lynx, human disturbance while controlling for resource availability.</p> Results <p>We found no evidence that deer shifted habitat selection in presence of hunting, while lynx predation risk was associated with greater preference for open habitat at night. When both hunting and lynx co-occurred, deer selection for open and forest was driven by the presence of lynx rather than hunters. In absence of any lethal risk, deer habitat selection was driven by avoidance of non-lethal human disturbance. Time of day and season were important determinants of deer habitat selection.</p> Conclusions <p>We found a consistent response to predation risk by lynx, while hunting induced a more variable response, probably due to large across-site variability. Adjusting habitat selection and activity at different temporal scales as a function of these relative risks allows ungulates to navigate in the dynamic multi-risk landscape of Europe’s anthropogenic environments. Our results set the empirical baseline which will help to disentangle habitat selection and activity shifts in future hunter-predator–prey studies, as the large predator guild in Europe further re-establishes, and human impact on natural habitats increases.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Navigating multi-predator dynamic risk landscapes in anthropogenic environments: spatio-temporal plasticity in roe deer habitat selection

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月13日

查看全文
  • Benedikt Gehr,
  • Adam. F. Smith,
  • Simone Ciuti,
  • Stefanie Muff,
  • Nadège C. Bonnot,
  • Federico Ossi,
  • Nicolas Morellet,
  • Anne Berger,
  • Tomasz Borowik,
  • Johannes De Groeve,
  • Marco Heurich,
  • Lukas Keller,
  • Petter Kjellander,
  • Max Kroeschel,
  • Sandro Nicoloso,
  • Nathan Ranc,
  • Peter Sunde,
  • Rita T. Torres,
  • Jean-Michel Gaillard,
  • Francesca Cagnacci

摘要

Context

Non-lethal and lethal human activities such as hunting or agricultural practices strongly shape the movement and behaviour of wildlife populations. The recent return of natural predators in parts of the world complexifies the risk landscape for prey in anthropogenic ecosystems. Disentangling the effects of human and natural predators on the ability of hunted species to navigate dynamic landscapes of risk will improve efforts to sustainably manage game species and predators in human-dominated landscapes.

Objectives

We investigated how roe deer may flexibly adjust the selection for open and forest habitats to trade-off between hunting and natural predation risk. We used a large dataset across Europe with areas with and without risk from human hunting and lynx predation, while controlling for non-lethal human disturbance using the Human Footprint Index.

Methods

We used integrated step selection analysis at diel and seasonal temporal scales to investigate selection of open vs. forest habitats across sites differing in the occurrence and timing of the hunting season, presence of lynx, human disturbance while controlling for resource availability.

Results

We found no evidence that deer shifted habitat selection in presence of hunting, while lynx predation risk was associated with greater preference for open habitat at night. When both hunting and lynx co-occurred, deer selection for open and forest was driven by the presence of lynx rather than hunters. In absence of any lethal risk, deer habitat selection was driven by avoidance of non-lethal human disturbance. Time of day and season were important determinants of deer habitat selection.

Conclusions

We found a consistent response to predation risk by lynx, while hunting induced a more variable response, probably due to large across-site variability. Adjusting habitat selection and activity at different temporal scales as a function of these relative risks allows ungulates to navigate in the dynamic multi-risk landscape of Europe’s anthropogenic environments. Our results set the empirical baseline which will help to disentangle habitat selection and activity shifts in future hunter-predator–prey studies, as the large predator guild in Europe further re-establishes, and human impact on natural habitats increases.