Scholarlink

Context <p>Understanding how ecological patterns and processes are affected by spatial heterogeneity is a foundational goal of landscape ecology. Recent extensions of this field have explored how habitat-associated soundscapes could inform biodiversity assessments and conservation decisions.</p> Objectives <p>The present study aims to expand understanding of spatial variation in estuarine soundscapes by evaluating its relationship with the surrounding habitat mosaics, nektonic community, and abiotic variables.</p> Methods <p>We sampled 24 habitat mosaics, including seagrass beds, saltmarsh creeks, oyster reefs, and unvegetated mudflats, in Back and Core Sounds, North Carolina, USA, during six sampling periods from May to August 2019. Soundscape summaries, including sound pressure level (SPL) and species-specific calls, were paired with patch- and landscape-scale habitat, community, and abiotic metrics. Differences among the acoustic spectrum at each site were evaluated using the spectral dissimilarity index and visualized using multivariate analyses. Multi-model inference and variance partitioning were used to evaluate the proportion of soundscape variation explained by each ecological metric.</p> Results <p>Landscape-scale habitat metrics were important explanatory variables for all soundscape metrics summarized. Specifically, multivariate analyses revealed four common soundscape types best differentiated by metrics of habitat size and shape at patch and landscape scales and the dominant sources of biological acoustic activity. Variation in SPL across the continuum of habitat heterogeneity sampled was typically explained by landscape-scale habitat metrics such as species richness, seagrass core area, and oyster reef perimeter. Species-specific call rates were explained by habitat and abiotic metrics and were unrelated to nektonic abundance and richness.</p> Conclusions <p>Our results suggest that soundscape metrics could be useful for monitoring estuarine habitat mosaics and acoustic communities over space and time as well as indicating environmental relationships for some soniferous species, though soundscapes may not be an effective proxy for nekton assemblage structure. This study also highlights the value of integrating multiple remote sensing technologies to understand patterns between landscape structure, ecological dynamics, and estuarine soundscapes as well as demonstrates the application of deep learning frameworks for interpretation of soundscape patterns.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Eavesdropping on estuaries: soundscape spatial variation explained by habitat metrics at multiple scales

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月4日

查看全文
  • Rebecca V. Van Hoeck,
  • DelWayne R. Bohnenstiehl,
  • F. Joel Fodrie

摘要

Context

Understanding how ecological patterns and processes are affected by spatial heterogeneity is a foundational goal of landscape ecology. Recent extensions of this field have explored how habitat-associated soundscapes could inform biodiversity assessments and conservation decisions.

Objectives

The present study aims to expand understanding of spatial variation in estuarine soundscapes by evaluating its relationship with the surrounding habitat mosaics, nektonic community, and abiotic variables.

Methods

We sampled 24 habitat mosaics, including seagrass beds, saltmarsh creeks, oyster reefs, and unvegetated mudflats, in Back and Core Sounds, North Carolina, USA, during six sampling periods from May to August 2019. Soundscape summaries, including sound pressure level (SPL) and species-specific calls, were paired with patch- and landscape-scale habitat, community, and abiotic metrics. Differences among the acoustic spectrum at each site were evaluated using the spectral dissimilarity index and visualized using multivariate analyses. Multi-model inference and variance partitioning were used to evaluate the proportion of soundscape variation explained by each ecological metric.

Results

Landscape-scale habitat metrics were important explanatory variables for all soundscape metrics summarized. Specifically, multivariate analyses revealed four common soundscape types best differentiated by metrics of habitat size and shape at patch and landscape scales and the dominant sources of biological acoustic activity. Variation in SPL across the continuum of habitat heterogeneity sampled was typically explained by landscape-scale habitat metrics such as species richness, seagrass core area, and oyster reef perimeter. Species-specific call rates were explained by habitat and abiotic metrics and were unrelated to nektonic abundance and richness.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that soundscape metrics could be useful for monitoring estuarine habitat mosaics and acoustic communities over space and time as well as indicating environmental relationships for some soniferous species, though soundscapes may not be an effective proxy for nekton assemblage structure. This study also highlights the value of integrating multiple remote sensing technologies to understand patterns between landscape structure, ecological dynamics, and estuarine soundscapes as well as demonstrates the application of deep learning frameworks for interpretation of soundscape patterns.