<p>In this essay, I examine the alternative futures of right sketched out in the pioneering works of Evgeny Pashukanis, Alexandre Kojève, and Ernst Bloch with the aim of demonstrating their continued relevance for critical approaches to law and the possibility of ‘socialist’ and ‘communist’ constitutionalism. Each of these thinkers engaged in a critical analysis of law and theorised the nature, function, and future of right under emancipatory social conditions. Pashukanis, who remains the best known Soviet legal theorist in the West, theorised that ‘legal regulation’ and the ‘opposition of private interests’ in the capitalist market would be replaced by ‘technical regulation’ and thoroughgoing planning under communism, although he allowed for residual elements of the legal form to persist during the period of revolutionary transition from capitalism to communism. Kojève, for his part, theorised that ‘bourgeois right’ and its market-based standard of ‘equivalence’ would give way to a synthesised account of ‘equity’ in the Socialist Empire of private international socialist right. Finally, Bloch sought to retrieve for Marxism the radical heritage of natural law from below by reinscribing upon the banners of communism such values as human dignity, solidarity, and the reconstitution of juridical personhood. While Pashukanis and Kojève strive towards a definite finality in their respective futures or end-states, Bloch resists any such finality as foreign to the constitution of socialism in his speculative account of natural law from below. Far from reinforcing the paucity of Marxist reflections on right, the interventions of Pashukanis, Kojève, and Bloch serve as powerful reminders about the diverse futures of right that exist within the vibrant Marxist tradition. It is high time that we revisit the contributions of these largely neglected but imaginative thinkers when considering alternative futures of right and of constitutionalism beyond capitalism.</p>