<p>This study investigates the surface thermodynamic properties of α-alumina, poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), and PMMA adsorbed on alumina as functions of temperature (303–473&#xa0;K) and recovery fraction <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\theta\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>θ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The analysis is performed using inverse gas chromatography at infinite dilution within a thermodynamic framework based on the Hamieh thermal model and the London dispersion interaction equation. The methodology enables the determination of the London dispersive surface energy (LDSE), the dispersive and polar free energies of adsorption, the Lewis acid–base surface energy components, and the total surface energy. The results show that <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\gamma}_{\text{s}}^{\text{d}}(T,\theta )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msubsup> <mi>γ</mi> <mrow> <mtext>s</mtext> </mrow> <mtext>d</mtext> </msubsup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>T</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>θ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> exhibits a nonlinear dependence on temperature, with characteristic maxima associated with transition phenomena. At the liquid–liquid transition, <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\gamma}_{\text{s}}^{\text{d}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msubsup> <mi>γ</mi> <mrow> <mtext>s</mtext> </mrow> <mtext>d</mtext> </msubsup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> reaches nearly constant values of approximately 26&#xa0;mJ&#xa0;m⁻<sup>2</sup>, indicating a polymer-dominated interfacial state. A significant dependence of surface energetic parameters on recovery fraction is observed, including a characteristic maximum around <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\theta \approx 0.38\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>θ</mi> <mo>≈</mo> <mn>0.38</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The glass transition temperature <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({T}_{\text{g}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>T</mi> <mtext>g</mtext> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> shows a systematic shift with <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\theta\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>θ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, whereas the β-relaxation temperature remains essentially constant. The analysis also reveals that polar (acid–base) interactions are more sensitive to <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\theta\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>θ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> than dispersive interactions, reflecting their localized and specific nature. The temperature and coverage dependence of interfacial properties is interpreted through the evolution of the intermolecular separation distance <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(H(T,\theta )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>H</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>T</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>θ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, which follows a bilinear behavior with sharp variations near transition temperatures. These results demonstrate that interfacial thermodynamics are governed by coupled effects of temperature, polymer mobility, and surface coverage. Overall, this work provides a consistent thermodynamic description of polymer–oxide interfaces, highlighting the importance of considering both temperature and surface coverage in the analysis of surface energetics and interfacial transitions.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

New advances in the determination of energetic surface properties and transition temperatures of poly(methyl methacrylate) adsorbed on alumina

  • Tayssir Hamieh

摘要

This study investigates the surface thermodynamic properties of α-alumina, poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), and PMMA adsorbed on alumina as functions of temperature (303–473 K) and recovery fraction \(\theta\) θ . The analysis is performed using inverse gas chromatography at infinite dilution within a thermodynamic framework based on the Hamieh thermal model and the London dispersion interaction equation. The methodology enables the determination of the London dispersive surface energy (LDSE), the dispersive and polar free energies of adsorption, the Lewis acid–base surface energy components, and the total surface energy. The results show that \({\gamma}_{\text{s}}^{\text{d}}(T,\theta )\) γ s d ( T , θ ) exhibits a nonlinear dependence on temperature, with characteristic maxima associated with transition phenomena. At the liquid–liquid transition, \({\gamma}_{\text{s}}^{\text{d}}\) γ s d reaches nearly constant values of approximately 26 mJ m⁻2, indicating a polymer-dominated interfacial state. A significant dependence of surface energetic parameters on recovery fraction is observed, including a characteristic maximum around \(\theta \approx 0.38\) θ 0.38 . The glass transition temperature \({T}_{\text{g}}\) T g shows a systematic shift with \(\theta\) θ , whereas the β-relaxation temperature remains essentially constant. The analysis also reveals that polar (acid–base) interactions are more sensitive to \(\theta\) θ than dispersive interactions, reflecting their localized and specific nature. The temperature and coverage dependence of interfacial properties is interpreted through the evolution of the intermolecular separation distance \(H(T,\theta )\) H ( T , θ ) , which follows a bilinear behavior with sharp variations near transition temperatures. These results demonstrate that interfacial thermodynamics are governed by coupled effects of temperature, polymer mobility, and surface coverage. Overall, this work provides a consistent thermodynamic description of polymer–oxide interfaces, highlighting the importance of considering both temperature and surface coverage in the analysis of surface energetics and interfacial transitions.