<p>A gamma-gamma (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\upgamma }}-{{\upgamma }}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">γ</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">γ</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) coincidence spectrometer was modelled using the Geant4 toolkit and validated against experimental measurements. Incorporation of a decay-time estimation method enabled the generation of time-stamped list mode (T-List) data, facilitating a quantitative assessment of the performance advantages of high-resolution <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\upgamma }}-{{\upgamma }}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">γ</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">γ</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> coincidence spectrometry relative to conventional high-resolution <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\upgamma }}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">γ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-spectrometry. The detection limit sensitivity for specific radionuclides of interest in the presence of a specified contaminant were investigated and the relative benefits of coincidence analysis discussed. The detection limit for <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{\text {134}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mtext>134</mtext> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Cs, using the 605-795 keV signature, is shown to be independent of <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{\text {137}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mtext>137</mtext> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Cs activity but sensitive to <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{\text {132}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mtext>132</mtext> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>I due to the presence of abundant high-energy coincident photons. Similarly, the potential acceleration of analytical timelines through the combination of partial radiochemical separation and <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\upgamma }}-{{\upgamma }}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">γ</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">γ</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> coincidence spectrometry is explored. For example, <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{\text {156}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mtext>156</mtext> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Eu is predicted to be detectable in fission product matrices containing other lanthanide radionuclides using <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\upgamma }}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">γ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>–<InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\upgamma }}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">γ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> coincidence spectrometry, despite remaining below conventional <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\upgamma }}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">γ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-spectrometric detection limits, with quantifiable results obtainable several hours earlier than via full radiochemical separation followed by standard <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\upgamma }}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">γ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-spectrometry. In the analysis of compositionally complex samples, this approach also enables the identification of radionuclides that adversely affect detection limits, thereby highlighting candidates for removal by radiochemical separation.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Assessing improvements in sensitivity and measurement timescales using gamma-gamma coincidence spectrometry for assay measurements

  • T. C. Stokes,
  • M. A. Goodwin,
  • M. J. Jackson,
  • A. J. Boston

摘要

A gamma-gamma ( \({{\upgamma }}-{{\upgamma }}\) γ - γ ) coincidence spectrometer was modelled using the Geant4 toolkit and validated against experimental measurements. Incorporation of a decay-time estimation method enabled the generation of time-stamped list mode (T-List) data, facilitating a quantitative assessment of the performance advantages of high-resolution \({{\upgamma }}-{{\upgamma }}\) γ - γ coincidence spectrometry relative to conventional high-resolution \({{\upgamma }}\) γ -spectrometry. The detection limit sensitivity for specific radionuclides of interest in the presence of a specified contaminant were investigated and the relative benefits of coincidence analysis discussed. The detection limit for \(^{\text {134}}\) 134 Cs, using the 605-795 keV signature, is shown to be independent of \(^{\text {137}}\) 137 Cs activity but sensitive to \(^{\text {132}}\) 132 I due to the presence of abundant high-energy coincident photons. Similarly, the potential acceleration of analytical timelines through the combination of partial radiochemical separation and \({{\upgamma }}-{{\upgamma }}\) γ - γ coincidence spectrometry is explored. For example, \(^{\text {156}}\) 156 Eu is predicted to be detectable in fission product matrices containing other lanthanide radionuclides using \({{\upgamma }}\) γ \({{\upgamma }}\) γ coincidence spectrometry, despite remaining below conventional \({{\upgamma }}\) γ -spectrometric detection limits, with quantifiable results obtainable several hours earlier than via full radiochemical separation followed by standard \({{\upgamma }}\) γ -spectrometry. In the analysis of compositionally complex samples, this approach also enables the identification of radionuclides that adversely affect detection limits, thereby highlighting candidates for removal by radiochemical separation.