<p>We consider the initial enlargement <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10959_2025_1445_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="27" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\mathbb {F}}}^{(\zeta )}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">F</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>ζ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of a filtration <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10959_2025_1445_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="12" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\mathbb {F}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">F</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (called the reference filtration) generated by a marked point process with a random variable <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10959_2025_1445_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\zeta \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>ζ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We assume Jacod’s absolute continuity hypothesis, that is, the existence of a nonnegative conditional density for this random variable with respect to <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10959_2025_1445_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="12" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\mathbb {F}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">F</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Then, we derive explicit expressions for the coefficients that appear in the integral representation for the optional projection of an <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10959_2025_1445_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="27" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\mathbb {F}}}^{(\zeta )}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">F</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>ζ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-(square integrable) martingale on <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10959_2025_1445_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="12" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\mathbb {F}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">F</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. In the case in which <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10959_2025_1445_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\zeta \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>ζ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is strictly positive (called a random time in that case), we also derive explicit expressions for the coefficients, that appear in the related representation for the optional projection of an <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10959_2025_1445_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="27" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\mathbb {F}}}^{(\zeta )}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">F</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>ζ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </msup> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-martingale on <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10959_2025_1445_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\mathbb {G}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, the reference filtration progressively enlarged by <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10959_2025_1445_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\zeta \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>ζ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We also provide similar results for the <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10959_2025_1445_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="12" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\mathbb {F}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">F</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>-optional projection of any martingale in <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="10959_2025_1445_Article_IEq9.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({{\mathbb {G}}}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">G</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The arguments of the proof are built on the methodology that was developed in our paper (Gapeev et al. in Electron J Probab 26:1–24 2021) in the Brownian motion setting under the more restrictive Jacod’s equivalence hypothesis.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Projections in Enlargements of Filtrations under Jacod’s Absolute Continuity Hypothesis for Marked Point Processes

  • Pavel V. Gapeev,
  • Monique Jeanblanc,
  • Dongli Wu

摘要

We consider the initial enlargement \({{\mathbb {F}}}^{(\zeta )}\) F ( ζ ) of a filtration \({{\mathbb {F}}}\) F (called the reference filtration) generated by a marked point process with a random variable \(\zeta \) ζ . We assume Jacod’s absolute continuity hypothesis, that is, the existence of a nonnegative conditional density for this random variable with respect to \({{\mathbb {F}}}\) F . Then, we derive explicit expressions for the coefficients that appear in the integral representation for the optional projection of an \({{\mathbb {F}}}^{(\zeta )}\) F ( ζ ) -(square integrable) martingale on \({{\mathbb {F}}}\) F . In the case in which \(\zeta \) ζ is strictly positive (called a random time in that case), we also derive explicit expressions for the coefficients, that appear in the related representation for the optional projection of an \({{\mathbb {F}}}^{(\zeta )}\) F ( ζ ) -martingale on \({{\mathbb {G}}}\) G , the reference filtration progressively enlarged by \(\zeta \) ζ . We also provide similar results for the \({{\mathbb {F}}}\) F -optional projection of any martingale in \({{\mathbb {G}}}\) G . The arguments of the proof are built on the methodology that was developed in our paper (Gapeev et al. in Electron J Probab 26:1–24 2021) in the Brownian motion setting under the more restrictive Jacod’s equivalence hypothesis.