Scholarlink

<p>Eco-villages have emerged as laboratories of alternative socio-spatial organisation, generating practices that may inform the retrofitting of mainstream low-density housing settlements. This paper examines how principles developed in Danish eco-villages can be translated into settlements that share comparable spatial typologies, such as suburban areas, peri-urban districts, and small towns characterised by dispersed morphology and limited shared infrastructure, but differ in their underlying socio-spatial conditions. Based on fieldwork in three communities—Andelssamfundet i Hjortshøj, Karise Permatopia, and Svanholm—the study draws on semi-structured interviews, spatial observations, and GIS-based geo-surveys. Using an analytical framework focused on community, built environment, and ecology, it identifies strategies linking collective agency with everyday resource stewardship. While the three cases share sustainability-oriented values, they differ in governance and socio-ecological organisation: Hjortshøj emphasises informal collaboration, Permatopia integrates family-oriented permaculture routines, and Svanholm represents structured collectivism and agricultural production. The paper argues that retrofitting requires translation rather than replication. Because social organisation and spatial form are mutually constitutive, selective adaptation must extend beyond spatial typologies to the governance routines and participation infrastructures that sustain collective life. Such translation is enabled by sustained institutional support and shared spatial resources, but is constrained by self-selection dynamics, unequal access, and volunteer dependency.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Eco-communities as socio-spatial laboratories: Lessons for retrofitting low-density housing settlements

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月24日

查看全文
  • Weronika Mazurkiewicz,
  • Michael Asgaard Andersen

摘要

Eco-villages have emerged as laboratories of alternative socio-spatial organisation, generating practices that may inform the retrofitting of mainstream low-density housing settlements. This paper examines how principles developed in Danish eco-villages can be translated into settlements that share comparable spatial typologies, such as suburban areas, peri-urban districts, and small towns characterised by dispersed morphology and limited shared infrastructure, but differ in their underlying socio-spatial conditions. Based on fieldwork in three communities—Andelssamfundet i Hjortshøj, Karise Permatopia, and Svanholm—the study draws on semi-structured interviews, spatial observations, and GIS-based geo-surveys. Using an analytical framework focused on community, built environment, and ecology, it identifies strategies linking collective agency with everyday resource stewardship. While the three cases share sustainability-oriented values, they differ in governance and socio-ecological organisation: Hjortshøj emphasises informal collaboration, Permatopia integrates family-oriented permaculture routines, and Svanholm represents structured collectivism and agricultural production. The paper argues that retrofitting requires translation rather than replication. Because social organisation and spatial form are mutually constitutive, selective adaptation must extend beyond spatial typologies to the governance routines and participation infrastructures that sustain collective life. Such translation is enabled by sustained institutional support and shared spatial resources, but is constrained by self-selection dynamics, unequal access, and volunteer dependency.