Purpose <p>Research reveals that Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, Queer and Asexual (LGBTIQA+) individuals experience Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) at equal or higher rates than their heterosexual counterparts. LGBTIQA+ critiques argue that current research and services, often designed and implemented within a heteronormative lens, inadequately respond to the unique needs of queer people. This study explored insights from practitioners on Same-Sex Intimate Partner Violence (SSIPV) dynamics, their experiences of working with queer people, and practice gaps, aiming to build knowledge for policy and practice responses.</p> Method <p>Underpinned by both Feminist and Queer theory, this qualitative study investigated perceptions and practice responses to SSIPV of practitioners in Victoria. Eleven semi-structured interviews were conducted, audio recorded and transcribed. An inductive thematic analysis was used for data analysis.</p> Results <p>The study found that while SSIPV was rooted in power and control, certain typologies, patterns and dynamics of abuse were unique to the LGBTIQA+ community. Participants highlighted that queer identity is often weaponized within abusive relationships, yet the current frameworks, risk assessments and safety planning frequently fail to recognize these dynamics. This led practitioners to take additional responsibilities and advocacy in the absence of a state-wide holistic approach, as homophobia, transphobia, heteronormativity, sexism and gendered stereotypes impacted the institutional responses to SSIPV.</p> Conclusions <p>Further research is needed to understand the nuanced dynamic of abuse and examine how to respond to practice and service gaps. It is essential to address homophobia, transphobia, and gendered stereotypes to ensure equitable and inclusive access to support systems.</p>