<p>A total dominating set in a graph <i>G</i>(<i>V</i>,&#xa0;<i>E</i>) is a vertex subset <i>D</i> such that every vertex in <i>V</i> is adjacent to some vertex in <i>D</i>. The cardinality of a minimum total dominating set in <i>G</i> is called the total domination number of <i>G</i>. Given a graph <i>G</i> and a positive integer <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(k\le |V(G)|,\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> the decision problem <span>Total Dominating Set</span> is to decide whether <i>G</i> has a total dominating set of size at most <i>k</i>. We prove that <span>Total Dominating Set</span> is NP-complete on (i) 2-degenerate planar perfect elimination bipartite graphs of maximum degree three (Class <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {G}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), which improves a result by Garnero and Sau&#xa0;(Discr Math Theor Comput Sci 20:20, 2018. <a href="https://doi.org/10.23638/DMTCS-20-1-14">https://doi.org/10.23638/DMTCS-20-1-14</a>), and (ii) the intersection class of star-convex, comb-convex, and perfect elimination bipartite graphs (Class <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {H}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>). Chlebík and Chlebíková&#xa0;(Inf Comput 206(11):1264–1275, 2008) proved that the total domination number cannot be approximated within a factor of <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((1-\epsilon )\ln n\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for any <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\epsilon &gt;0\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> on bipartite graphs unless <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(NP\subseteq Dtime(n^{O(\log \log n)})\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We strengthen this result by showing that the approximation hardness bound holds for the class <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {H}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, a subclass of bipartite graphs. Also, we proved that <span>Total Dominating Set</span> parameterized by solution size is W[2]-complete on the class <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {H}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. On the positive side, we show that <span>Total Dominating Set</span> parameterized by maximum degree is fixed-parameter tractable in star-convex bipartite graphs. A vertex subset <i>S</i> is called an open packing in <i>G</i> if, for every distinct <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(x',x''\in S\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(N_G(x')\cap N_G(x'')=\emptyset \)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, where <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(N_G(x)=\{y\in V(G):\, xy\in E(G)\}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for every <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(x\in V(G)\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. The cardinality of a maximum open packing in <i>G</i> is called the open packing number of <i>G</i>. Open packing and total domination is a pair of primal-dual graph problems and, for graphs without isolated vertices, the open packing number is a lower bound for the total domination number. The <span>Open Packing</span> problem takes a graph <i>G</i> and a positive integer <i>k</i> as inputs and checks whether <i>G</i> has an open packing of size at least <i>k</i>. It is known that <span>Open Packing</span> is NP-complete in bipartite graphs. Our work strengthens this result by showing that the problem remains NP-complete on (i) class <InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {G}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and (ii) class <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {H}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We further infer that on the graph class <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {H}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, (i) open packing number is hard to approximate within a factor of <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(n^{\frac{1}{2}-\epsilon }\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for any <InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\epsilon &gt;0\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> unless P = NP and (ii) <span>Open Packing</span> parameterized by solution size is W[1]-complete. Also, we show that <span>Open Packing</span> parameterized by maximum degree is fixed-parameter tractable in star convex bipartite graphs. In addition, we design polynomial time algorithms to find a maximum open packing in circular-convex bipartite graphs and triad-convex bipartite graphs.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Total domination and open packing in some subclasses of bipartite graphs

  • M. A. Shalu,
  • V. K. Kirubakaran

摘要

A total dominating set in a graph G(VE) is a vertex subset D such that every vertex in V is adjacent to some vertex in D. The cardinality of a minimum total dominating set in G is called the total domination number of G. Given a graph G and a positive integer \(k\le |V(G)|,\) the decision problem Total Dominating Set is to decide whether G has a total dominating set of size at most k. We prove that Total Dominating Set is NP-complete on (i) 2-degenerate planar perfect elimination bipartite graphs of maximum degree three (Class \(\mathcal {G}\) ), which improves a result by Garnero and Sau (Discr Math Theor Comput Sci 20:20, 2018. https://doi.org/10.23638/DMTCS-20-1-14), and (ii) the intersection class of star-convex, comb-convex, and perfect elimination bipartite graphs (Class \(\mathcal {H}\) ). Chlebík and Chlebíková (Inf Comput 206(11):1264–1275, 2008) proved that the total domination number cannot be approximated within a factor of \((1-\epsilon )\ln n\) for any \(\epsilon >0\) on bipartite graphs unless \(NP\subseteq Dtime(n^{O(\log \log n)})\) . We strengthen this result by showing that the approximation hardness bound holds for the class \(\mathcal {H}\) , a subclass of bipartite graphs. Also, we proved that Total Dominating Set parameterized by solution size is W[2]-complete on the class \(\mathcal {H}\) . On the positive side, we show that Total Dominating Set parameterized by maximum degree is fixed-parameter tractable in star-convex bipartite graphs. A vertex subset S is called an open packing in G if, for every distinct \(x',x''\in S\) , \(N_G(x')\cap N_G(x'')=\emptyset \) , where \(N_G(x)=\{y\in V(G):\, xy\in E(G)\}\) for every \(x\in V(G)\) . The cardinality of a maximum open packing in G is called the open packing number of G. Open packing and total domination is a pair of primal-dual graph problems and, for graphs without isolated vertices, the open packing number is a lower bound for the total domination number. The Open Packing problem takes a graph G and a positive integer k as inputs and checks whether G has an open packing of size at least k. It is known that Open Packing is NP-complete in bipartite graphs. Our work strengthens this result by showing that the problem remains NP-complete on (i) class \(\mathcal {G}\) and (ii) class \(\mathcal {H}\) . We further infer that on the graph class \(\mathcal {H}\) , (i) open packing number is hard to approximate within a factor of \(n^{\frac{1}{2}-\epsilon }\) for any \(\epsilon >0\) unless P = NP and (ii) Open Packing parameterized by solution size is W[1]-complete. Also, we show that Open Packing parameterized by maximum degree is fixed-parameter tractable in star convex bipartite graphs. In addition, we design polynomial time algorithms to find a maximum open packing in circular-convex bipartite graphs and triad-convex bipartite graphs.