<p>A clear and systematic terminological framework is essential for exactly describing a patient’s hemodynamic state. After assessing absolute values of hemodynamic variables and considering the specific clinical context, the absolute values should be classified as ‘normal’, ‘higher than normal’, or ‘lower than normal’ – or as being ‘inside the target range’ or ‘outside the target range’. The acuity and dynamics of changes in the hemodynamic variables should be described. The alterations should then be assigned semiological names reflecting the corresponding ‘clinical sign’. Finally, it should be determined whether the alteration in the hemodynamic variable results in a state of acute circulatory failure or shock.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Describing hemodynamic states: a plea for systematic terminology

  • Bernd Saugel,
  • Karim Lakhal

摘要

A clear and systematic terminological framework is essential for exactly describing a patient’s hemodynamic state. After assessing absolute values of hemodynamic variables and considering the specific clinical context, the absolute values should be classified as ‘normal’, ‘higher than normal’, or ‘lower than normal’ – or as being ‘inside the target range’ or ‘outside the target range’. The acuity and dynamics of changes in the hemodynamic variables should be described. The alterations should then be assigned semiological names reflecting the corresponding ‘clinical sign’. Finally, it should be determined whether the alteration in the hemodynamic variable results in a state of acute circulatory failure or shock.