<p>A prodrug is a pharmacologically inactive (or attenuated) derivative that undergoes bioreversible transformation in vivo to release an active parent drug, enabling temporary optimization of properties such as solubility, permeability, and targeting. Despite expanding catalogs of known prodrugs, <i>in silico</i> screening remains limited by the absence of reliable negative examples: training/evaluation sets often contain only positives or ad-hoc decoys, leading to class imbalance, property-mismatch shortcuts, and irreproducible benchmarks. Unfortunately, the limitation of reliable negatives has resulted in there being no efficient machine learning-based prodrug screening approach. Therefore, we introduce Prodrug-ML, an efficient <i>machine learning-based</i> screen for prodrug-likeness that prioritizes candidates rather than asserting mechanistic truth. <i>Prodrug-ML helps medicinal chemists</i> triage prodrugging ideas during hit-to-lead and lead optimization, filter enumerated libraries of promoiety–attachment variants before ADMET assays, and retrospectively mine internal/ChEMBL-like collections to surface likely prodrug chemotypes. <i>In practice</i>, users (i) generate or collect candidate structures (e.g., parent drug ± pro-moieties), (ii) score them with Prodrug-ML, and (iii) advance only high-scoring candidates to synthesis/assay, thereby reducing wet-lab load while maintaining chemical diversity. In order to achieve such practical usage, the Prodrug-ML framework, containing the default classifier, LightGBM, addresses these issues by (i) constructing three complementary, property-controlled negative cohorts (DUD-E–style near-misses, random ChEMBL, and strictly filtered ChEMBL), (ii) hardness control and label-noise guardrails on decoys, (iii) domain-bias control, and (iv) cross-decoy validation with multimodel feature selection. Produg-ML has been evaluated five times on hold-out data and an unseen test benchmark, after 80% of training data. In the benchmarks, the multimodel ensemble consistently improves early retrieval and overall discrimination, attaining <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{EF}@1\%\approx 6\text {--}8\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{EF}@5\%\approx 5\text {--}6\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{BEDROC}_{20}\approx 0.78\text {--}0.82\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{BEDROC}_{50}\approx 0.90\text {--}0.95\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{BEDROC}_{80}\approx 0.95\text {--}0.99\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, alongside ROC AUC <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\approx 0.86\text {--}0.87\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, average precision <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\approx 0.60\text {--}0.65\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and F1 <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\approx 0.58\text {--}0.62\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. As a result, these results, especially high BEDROC scores, are consistent with concentrating at least a prodrug within the top <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\sim 2\text {--}3\%\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of ranked candidates, implying <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\sim 97\text {--}98\%\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> reductions in experimental time and cost when using standard wet-lab workflows that assay only the early tranche.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Prodrug-ML: prodrug-likeness prediction via machine learning on sampled negative decoys

  • Sadettin Y. Ugurlu,
  • Shan He

摘要

A prodrug is a pharmacologically inactive (or attenuated) derivative that undergoes bioreversible transformation in vivo to release an active parent drug, enabling temporary optimization of properties such as solubility, permeability, and targeting. Despite expanding catalogs of known prodrugs, in silico screening remains limited by the absence of reliable negative examples: training/evaluation sets often contain only positives or ad-hoc decoys, leading to class imbalance, property-mismatch shortcuts, and irreproducible benchmarks. Unfortunately, the limitation of reliable negatives has resulted in there being no efficient machine learning-based prodrug screening approach. Therefore, we introduce Prodrug-ML, an efficient machine learning-based screen for prodrug-likeness that prioritizes candidates rather than asserting mechanistic truth. Prodrug-ML helps medicinal chemists triage prodrugging ideas during hit-to-lead and lead optimization, filter enumerated libraries of promoiety–attachment variants before ADMET assays, and retrospectively mine internal/ChEMBL-like collections to surface likely prodrug chemotypes. In practice, users (i) generate or collect candidate structures (e.g., parent drug ± pro-moieties), (ii) score them with Prodrug-ML, and (iii) advance only high-scoring candidates to synthesis/assay, thereby reducing wet-lab load while maintaining chemical diversity. In order to achieve such practical usage, the Prodrug-ML framework, containing the default classifier, LightGBM, addresses these issues by (i) constructing three complementary, property-controlled negative cohorts (DUD-E–style near-misses, random ChEMBL, and strictly filtered ChEMBL), (ii) hardness control and label-noise guardrails on decoys, (iii) domain-bias control, and (iv) cross-decoy validation with multimodel feature selection. Produg-ML has been evaluated five times on hold-out data and an unseen test benchmark, after 80% of training data. In the benchmarks, the multimodel ensemble consistently improves early retrieval and overall discrimination, attaining \(\textrm{EF}@1\%\approx 6\text {--}8\) , \(\textrm{EF}@5\%\approx 5\text {--}6\) , \(\textrm{BEDROC}_{20}\approx 0.78\text {--}0.82\) , \(\textrm{BEDROC}_{50}\approx 0.90\text {--}0.95\) , and \(\textrm{BEDROC}_{80}\approx 0.95\text {--}0.99\) , alongside ROC AUC \(\approx 0.86\text {--}0.87\) , average precision \(\approx 0.60\text {--}0.65\) , and F1 \(\approx 0.58\text {--}0.62\) . As a result, these results, especially high BEDROC scores, are consistent with concentrating at least a prodrug within the top \(\sim 2\text {--}3\%\) of ranked candidates, implying \(\sim 97\text {--}98\%\) reductions in experimental time and cost when using standard wet-lab workflows that assay only the early tranche.