Purpose <p>To investigate whether the one-step warming (OW) procedure affects oocyte survival and developmental potential after fertilization in vitrified oocytes.</p> Methods <p>Standard vitrified mouse oocytes were warmed using two different procedures: (1) standard multi-step warming (SW) and (2) one-step warming (OW). The survival rates and early embryonic development potentials of the warmed oocytes were compared following insemination by piezo-ICSI. Spindle integrity of the warmed oocytes was evaluated by α-tubulin/Hoechst staining, and mitochondrial status was assessed using Mitotracker/JC-1 staining, with mitochondrial damage analyzed by Confocal microscope. Additionally, the apoptosis status of the resulting blastocysts in each group was compared using a TUNEL assay.</p> Results <p>The OW procedure maintained oocyte survival and fertilization rates comparable to those of the SW procedure, but significantly (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) increased blastocyst development after fertilization. Mechanistic measures revealed that the OW procedure improved embryonic developmental potential by mitigating mitochondrial damage compared with the SW procedure.</p> Conclusions <p>These findings provide a theoretical foundation for optimizing the OW procedure for already vitrified and stored oocytes in ARTs.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

One-step warming procedure improves embryonic development of vitrified mouse oocytes by mitigating mitochondrial damage

  • Hao Wang,
  • Mingzhe Li,
  • Qi Jiang,
  • Qiaodan Li,
  • Xue Sun,
  • Youjiang Li,
  • Xiao Chen,
  • Jian Xu,
  • Ri-Cheng Chian

摘要

Purpose

To investigate whether the one-step warming (OW) procedure affects oocyte survival and developmental potential after fertilization in vitrified oocytes.

Methods

Standard vitrified mouse oocytes were warmed using two different procedures: (1) standard multi-step warming (SW) and (2) one-step warming (OW). The survival rates and early embryonic development potentials of the warmed oocytes were compared following insemination by piezo-ICSI. Spindle integrity of the warmed oocytes was evaluated by α-tubulin/Hoechst staining, and mitochondrial status was assessed using Mitotracker/JC-1 staining, with mitochondrial damage analyzed by Confocal microscope. Additionally, the apoptosis status of the resulting blastocysts in each group was compared using a TUNEL assay.

Results

The OW procedure maintained oocyte survival and fertilization rates comparable to those of the SW procedure, but significantly (P < 0.05) increased blastocyst development after fertilization. Mechanistic measures revealed that the OW procedure improved embryonic developmental potential by mitigating mitochondrial damage compared with the SW procedure.

Conclusions

These findings provide a theoretical foundation for optimizing the OW procedure for already vitrified and stored oocytes in ARTs.