Scholarlink

Background <p>Genomic sequencing yields vast amounts of data, and the access of&#xa0;patients and research participants to their raw genomic data raises ethical and practical dilemmas. </p> Purpose <p>This paper aims to examine a challenging, underexplored question: whether gamete donors' raw data should be provided to recipient parents. </p> Methods <p>Using a clinical case, we explore the key ethical, legal, and clinical implications of such access, weighing the advantages, disadvantages, and potential alternatives.</p> Results <p>Ethical implications include the feasibility of meaningful informed consent from donors for complex genetic testing, sometimes years after donation; privacy considerations; the type of medical information recipients can or should hold on donors; potential conflicts of interest between the donor and the child; and the potential for raised costs and commercial interests. Clinical implications involve the implementation of systems of storing donors' raw data and devices of re-contacting past donors. Legal aspects include&#xa0; the informed consent of gametes donors to disclose their raw data to recipient parents and privacy protections, including their right to keep their raw data in confidence.</p> Conclusion <p>We advocate a cautious approach that favors clinically mediated access over unrestricted parental access.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Should recipient parents have access to gamete donors’ raw genomic data? Clinical, legal, and ethical considerations

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月27日

查看全文
  • Shiri Shkedi-Rafid,
  • Aviad Raz,
  • Maya Sabatello,
  • Barbara Prainsack,
  • Roy Gilbar

摘要

Background

Genomic sequencing yields vast amounts of data, and the access of patients and research participants to their raw genomic data raises ethical and practical dilemmas.

Purpose

This paper aims to examine a challenging, underexplored question: whether gamete donors' raw data should be provided to recipient parents.

Methods

Using a clinical case, we explore the key ethical, legal, and clinical implications of such access, weighing the advantages, disadvantages, and potential alternatives.

Results

Ethical implications include the feasibility of meaningful informed consent from donors for complex genetic testing, sometimes years after donation; privacy considerations; the type of medical information recipients can or should hold on donors; potential conflicts of interest between the donor and the child; and the potential for raised costs and commercial interests. Clinical implications involve the implementation of systems of storing donors' raw data and devices of re-contacting past donors. Legal aspects include  the informed consent of gametes donors to disclose their raw data to recipient parents and privacy protections, including their right to keep their raw data in confidence.

Conclusion

We advocate a cautious approach that favors clinically mediated access over unrestricted parental access.