Scholarlink

Purpose <p>The objective of the multicenter study is to demonstrate the efficacy of the “<i>Universal Warming Protocol (UWP)</i>” using different devitrification media in donor oocytes that were previously vitrified in a single egg bank.</p> Method <p>A total of 2172 oocytes (metaphase II) were vitrified at Ovobank (Spain) using Kitazato vitrification media (Kitazato, Japan). The oocytes were devitrified at three different centers. Group A: 1021 oocytes devitrified with Kitazato media (Kitazato, Japan); Group B: 496 oocytes devitrified with Irvine media (Fujifilm Irvine Scientific, USA); Group C: 655 oocytes devitrified with RapidWarm Omni media (Vitrolife, Sweden). The study parameters included survival rate, fertilization rate, cleavage rate, blastulation rate, and a pregnancy rate confirmed by a biochemical test; transferring embryos at D + 3 and D + 5; and clinical pregnancy rate, transferring embryos at D + 3 and D + 5.</p> Results <p>The survival rate was statistically higher in Group C (94%) compared to Group A (86%) and Group B (85%) (<i>P</i> value &lt; 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in the remaining parameters: fertilization rate (A: 77%, B: 74%, C: 73%); cleavage rate (A: 83%, B: 83%, C: 80%); blastulation rate (A: 52%, B: 58%, C: 57%); a pregnancy rate confirmed by a biochemical test in transferring embryos at D + 3 (A: 38%, B: 33%, C: 33%); a pregnancy rate confirmed by a biochemical test in transferring embryos at D + 5 (A: 54%, B: 76%, C: 65%); clinical pregnancy rate in transferring embryos at D + 3 (A: 27%, B: 13%, C: 18%); clinical pregnancy rate in transferring embryos at D + 5 (A: 39%, B: 57%, C: 60%).</p> Conclusions <p>The idea that oocyte devitrification medium should always be from the same supplier is questionable. Therefore, it is feasible to use different devitrification media for donor oocytes that were vitrified with the same vitrification medium.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Application of a single “Universal warming protocol” for vitrified donor oocytes: A multicenter study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月28日

查看全文
  • Paloma Troncoso-Perez,
  • Cristina Gonzalez-Navas,
  • Maria Elisabetta Coccia,
  • Rossella Fucci,
  • Patrizia Falcone,
  • Francesco Bertocci,
  • Rita Picone,
  • Daniel Fernando Sosa-Rosales,
  • Nuria Lopez-Perez,
  • Enrique Criado-Scholz,
  • Miguel Angel Vilches-Ferron

摘要

Purpose

The objective of the multicenter study is to demonstrate the efficacy of the “Universal Warming Protocol (UWP)” using different devitrification media in donor oocytes that were previously vitrified in a single egg bank.

Method

A total of 2172 oocytes (metaphase II) were vitrified at Ovobank (Spain) using Kitazato vitrification media (Kitazato, Japan). The oocytes were devitrified at three different centers. Group A: 1021 oocytes devitrified with Kitazato media (Kitazato, Japan); Group B: 496 oocytes devitrified with Irvine media (Fujifilm Irvine Scientific, USA); Group C: 655 oocytes devitrified with RapidWarm Omni media (Vitrolife, Sweden). The study parameters included survival rate, fertilization rate, cleavage rate, blastulation rate, and a pregnancy rate confirmed by a biochemical test; transferring embryos at D + 3 and D + 5; and clinical pregnancy rate, transferring embryos at D + 3 and D + 5.

Results

The survival rate was statistically higher in Group C (94%) compared to Group A (86%) and Group B (85%) (P value < 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in the remaining parameters: fertilization rate (A: 77%, B: 74%, C: 73%); cleavage rate (A: 83%, B: 83%, C: 80%); blastulation rate (A: 52%, B: 58%, C: 57%); a pregnancy rate confirmed by a biochemical test in transferring embryos at D + 3 (A: 38%, B: 33%, C: 33%); a pregnancy rate confirmed by a biochemical test in transferring embryos at D + 5 (A: 54%, B: 76%, C: 65%); clinical pregnancy rate in transferring embryos at D + 3 (A: 27%, B: 13%, C: 18%); clinical pregnancy rate in transferring embryos at D + 5 (A: 39%, B: 57%, C: 60%).

Conclusions

The idea that oocyte devitrification medium should always be from the same supplier is questionable. Therefore, it is feasible to use different devitrification media for donor oocytes that were vitrified with the same vitrification medium.