Purpose <p>To examine caregiver age and mutuality as moderators in the relationship between caregiver strain and quality of life (QoL) among caregivers of offspring with intellectual and developmental disabilities (I/DD).</p> Methods <p>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 186 parents of offspring with I/DD. Moderation and three-way interaction analyses were performed using Hayes’ PROCESS macro to test caregiver age, mutuality, and their interaction as moderators of the association between caregiver strain and quality of life.</p> Results <p>The three-way interaction (caregiver strain × mutuality × caregiver age) was statistically significant (<i>p</i> = .01). Higher mutuality buffered the negative impact of caregiver strain on quality of life, but only among younger caregivers.</p> Conclusion <p>Mutuality serves as an important buffer against the detrimental effects of caregiver strain on quality of life for younger caregivers. However, this buffering effect diminishes as caregivers age. Interventions may benefit from an age-tailored approach, such as enhancing mutuality and relational support for younger caregivers while prioritizing tangible, practical support for older caregivers. These strategies could strengthen the design and delivery of caregiver support programs and policies.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Caregiver Strain and Quality of Life in Parents of Offspring With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Moderating Effects of Caregiver Age and Mutuality

  • E. Virginia Sticinski,
  • Valerie A. Earnshaw,
  • Steven Eidelman,
  • Allison Karpyn,
  • Sheau C. Chai

摘要

Purpose

To examine caregiver age and mutuality as moderators in the relationship between caregiver strain and quality of life (QoL) among caregivers of offspring with intellectual and developmental disabilities (I/DD).

Methods

A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 186 parents of offspring with I/DD. Moderation and three-way interaction analyses were performed using Hayes’ PROCESS macro to test caregiver age, mutuality, and their interaction as moderators of the association between caregiver strain and quality of life.

Results

The three-way interaction (caregiver strain × mutuality × caregiver age) was statistically significant (p = .01). Higher mutuality buffered the negative impact of caregiver strain on quality of life, but only among younger caregivers.

Conclusion

Mutuality serves as an important buffer against the detrimental effects of caregiver strain on quality of life for younger caregivers. However, this buffering effect diminishes as caregivers age. Interventions may benefit from an age-tailored approach, such as enhancing mutuality and relational support for younger caregivers while prioritizing tangible, practical support for older caregivers. These strategies could strengthen the design and delivery of caregiver support programs and policies.