Purpose <p>This qualitative study examined how Mexican early intervention (EI) providers develop professional expertise in autism services and navigate systemic barriers while providing culturally responsive interventions to families near the U.S.–Mexico border.</p> Methods <p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 Spanish-speaking EI providers from Tijuana and Mexicali who work with autistic children ages 0–7. Participants completed demographic questionnaires and discussed their professional development, service delivery practices, and experiences in border cities. Data were analyzed using inductive coding based on Mignolo’s “border thinking” and “epistemic disobedience” frameworks.</p> Results <p>Five themes emerged: (1) Service Gaps and Structural Inequities, highlighting systemic barriers in both public and private sectors; (2) Reclaiming Knowledge—Local Pathways to Professional Expertise, demonstrating how providers create alternative learning pathways through international training, mentorship, and self-directed education; (3) Challenging Deficit Narratives—A Strength-Based View of Families, showing how providers view caregivers as co-therapists and adapt interventions to family routines and cultural contexts; (4) Navigating Dual Systems—Service Provision in the Borderlands, illustrating providers’ adaptation to serve families across different healthcare and educational systems; and (5) Cross-Border Learning and Adaptation, revealing providers’ deliberate efforts to understand U.S. autism culture and supplement services for transfronterizx families.</p> Conclusion <p>Mexican EI providers demonstrate innovative approaches to autism intervention that challenge eurocentric models through culturally responsive, family-centered practices. Their unique border position enables them to bridge service gaps for transfronterizx families, though systemic barriers limit formal collaboration with U.S. providers. These findings highlight the need for increased cross-border partnerships to improve outcomes for Hispanic/Latine families navigating dual healthcare systems.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

“The Structural Rigidity of the U.S. is Missing in Mexico and the Diversity and Freedom of Mexico is Missing in the U.S.”: Experiences of Autism Service Providers Along the U.S.–Mexico Border

  • C. Orendain Soto,
  • A. D. Dueñas,
  • F. A. Castellón,
  • K. Valdez Lopez,
  • J. Rocha

摘要

Purpose

This qualitative study examined how Mexican early intervention (EI) providers develop professional expertise in autism services and navigate systemic barriers while providing culturally responsive interventions to families near the U.S.–Mexico border.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 Spanish-speaking EI providers from Tijuana and Mexicali who work with autistic children ages 0–7. Participants completed demographic questionnaires and discussed their professional development, service delivery practices, and experiences in border cities. Data were analyzed using inductive coding based on Mignolo’s “border thinking” and “epistemic disobedience” frameworks.

Results

Five themes emerged: (1) Service Gaps and Structural Inequities, highlighting systemic barriers in both public and private sectors; (2) Reclaiming Knowledge—Local Pathways to Professional Expertise, demonstrating how providers create alternative learning pathways through international training, mentorship, and self-directed education; (3) Challenging Deficit Narratives—A Strength-Based View of Families, showing how providers view caregivers as co-therapists and adapt interventions to family routines and cultural contexts; (4) Navigating Dual Systems—Service Provision in the Borderlands, illustrating providers’ adaptation to serve families across different healthcare and educational systems; and (5) Cross-Border Learning and Adaptation, revealing providers’ deliberate efforts to understand U.S. autism culture and supplement services for transfronterizx families.

Conclusion

Mexican EI providers demonstrate innovative approaches to autism intervention that challenge eurocentric models through culturally responsive, family-centered practices. Their unique border position enables them to bridge service gaps for transfronterizx families, though systemic barriers limit formal collaboration with U.S. providers. These findings highlight the need for increased cross-border partnerships to improve outcomes for Hispanic/Latine families navigating dual healthcare systems.