Scholarlink

<p>In the year 2020, two real-world vigilantism incidents invited nationwide discourses on social media: the fatal shooting of two men by Kyle Rittenhouse (an aggressor) and the murder of Ahmaud Arbery (a victim). The public engaged vigorously in social media discussions of approval or disapproval of the aggressor or victim in such vigilantism incidents. While diversity of opinions is a healthy driver of advancement, extreme polarization can be a powerful barrier to achieving societal progress and human flourishing. In this paper, we first examine public opinion regarding these vigilantism incidents. We identify various issues expressed in social media conversations and find that compared to victim-oriented discourse, aggressor-oriented discourse on vigilantism displays more opinion polarization. The discourses show that aggressor-oriented vigilantism discussions largely support vigilantism, self-defense, and the right to bear arms. On the other hand, victim-oriented discourses largely disapprove of vigilantism incidents. We also find that positive emotions in discourses are more polarized compared to negative emotions. Our work has practical implications concerning polarization on social media after devastating events.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Examination of Polarization in Social Media in Aggressor-Oriented and Victim-Oriented Discourse Following Vigilantism

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年1月9日

查看全文
  • Shalini Kapali Kurumathur,
  • Paras Bhatt,
  • Rohit Valecha,
  • Govind Hariharan,
  • H. Raghav Rao

摘要

In the year 2020, two real-world vigilantism incidents invited nationwide discourses on social media: the fatal shooting of two men by Kyle Rittenhouse (an aggressor) and the murder of Ahmaud Arbery (a victim). The public engaged vigorously in social media discussions of approval or disapproval of the aggressor or victim in such vigilantism incidents. While diversity of opinions is a healthy driver of advancement, extreme polarization can be a powerful barrier to achieving societal progress and human flourishing. In this paper, we first examine public opinion regarding these vigilantism incidents. We identify various issues expressed in social media conversations and find that compared to victim-oriented discourse, aggressor-oriented discourse on vigilantism displays more opinion polarization. The discourses show that aggressor-oriented vigilantism discussions largely support vigilantism, self-defense, and the right to bear arms. On the other hand, victim-oriented discourses largely disapprove of vigilantism incidents. We also find that positive emotions in discourses are more polarized compared to negative emotions. Our work has practical implications concerning polarization on social media after devastating events.