Purpose <p>To assess the macular vascular effects of prolonged use of latanoprost compared to the dorzolamide-timolol fixed combination in patients with very early-stage glaucoma, where glaucoma-specific damage has been minimized.</p> Methods <p>The retinal vascular effects of latanoprost versus the dorzolamide-timolol fixed combination were evaluated using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCT-A) in a case–control study design. A total of 71 eyes from 71 individuals were included in the study: 28 eyes receiving latanoprost (Group 1), 20 eyes receiving the dorzolamide-timolol combination (Group 2), and 23 eyes from healthy individuals (Group 3). Superficial, deep, and radial peripapillary capillary plexus vascular density (SCP-vd, DCP-vd, RPCP-vd) and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) measurements were taken with OCT-A. The comparative analysis between groups was performed with SPSS V.26.</p> Results <p>Across the groups (from 1 to 3), whole image vascular density (vd) measurements were as follows: SCP-vd: 45.86 ± 3.99, 44.58 ± 4.58, 48.35 ± 4.04; DCP-vd: 44.86 ± 5.75, 44.02 ± 6.87, 49.74 ± 4.84; and RPCP-vd: 46.97 ± 3.81, 47.07 ± 5.49, 49.90 ± 2.43. All these measurements were significantly decreased in both glaucoma groups (groups 1 and 2) compared to healthy subjects (group 3). In subgroup analyses of the macular region, including the fovea, parafovea, and perifovea, vd measurements were decreased in all areas except the fovea in glaucoma patients. However, no statistically significant differences were found between the latanoprost and dorzolamide-timolol groups regarding retinal vascular structure. In FAZ measurements, no significant differences were found in any anatomical location among the three groups.</p> Conclusion <p>This study demonstrates that latanoprost, the first prostaglandin analog known for its edema-inducing effect on the macula, does not have a long-term impact on macular vascularity. However, this result should be supported with longer and larger studies.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Investigating clues of cystoid macular edema from a vascular perspective under long-term latanoprost usage

  • Cansu Yuksel Elgin,
  • Ilayda Kaner Savci,
  • Yildiz Birisik,
  • Mustafa Hepokur

摘要

Purpose

To assess the macular vascular effects of prolonged use of latanoprost compared to the dorzolamide-timolol fixed combination in patients with very early-stage glaucoma, where glaucoma-specific damage has been minimized.

Methods

The retinal vascular effects of latanoprost versus the dorzolamide-timolol fixed combination were evaluated using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCT-A) in a case–control study design. A total of 71 eyes from 71 individuals were included in the study: 28 eyes receiving latanoprost (Group 1), 20 eyes receiving the dorzolamide-timolol combination (Group 2), and 23 eyes from healthy individuals (Group 3). Superficial, deep, and radial peripapillary capillary plexus vascular density (SCP-vd, DCP-vd, RPCP-vd) and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) measurements were taken with OCT-A. The comparative analysis between groups was performed with SPSS V.26.

Results

Across the groups (from 1 to 3), whole image vascular density (vd) measurements were as follows: SCP-vd: 45.86 ± 3.99, 44.58 ± 4.58, 48.35 ± 4.04; DCP-vd: 44.86 ± 5.75, 44.02 ± 6.87, 49.74 ± 4.84; and RPCP-vd: 46.97 ± 3.81, 47.07 ± 5.49, 49.90 ± 2.43. All these measurements were significantly decreased in both glaucoma groups (groups 1 and 2) compared to healthy subjects (group 3). In subgroup analyses of the macular region, including the fovea, parafovea, and perifovea, vd measurements were decreased in all areas except the fovea in glaucoma patients. However, no statistically significant differences were found between the latanoprost and dorzolamide-timolol groups regarding retinal vascular structure. In FAZ measurements, no significant differences were found in any anatomical location among the three groups.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that latanoprost, the first prostaglandin analog known for its edema-inducing effect on the macula, does not have a long-term impact on macular vascularity. However, this result should be supported with longer and larger studies.