Scholarlink

<p>We reply to the comment by Lambare who criticizes our interpretation of the linear Sagnac effect. To remove the discontinuity appearing with the use of the Lorentz transformations in the interpretation of the effect, Lambare introduces an ad hoc time interval <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((T)_{E}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>T</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mi>E</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> different from the one observed. By invalidating Lambare’s arguments, we claim that a consistent interpretation requires <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((T)_{E}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>T</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mi>E</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> to be the same as the one experimentally observed.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Reply to Lambare’s “Comment on “Entangled Simultaneity: Testing Lorentz and Light Speed Invariance with quantum and classical entanglement””

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月10日

查看全文
  • Gianfranco Spavieri

摘要

We reply to the comment by Lambare who criticizes our interpretation of the linear Sagnac effect. To remove the discontinuity appearing with the use of the Lorentz transformations in the interpretation of the effect, Lambare introduces an ad hoc time interval \((T)_{E}\) ( T ) E different from the one observed. By invalidating Lambare’s arguments, we claim that a consistent interpretation requires \((T)_{E}\) ( T ) E to be the same as the one experimentally observed.