Scholarlink

<p>In this comment, we demonstrate that the claim by Spavieri et al., asserting that Wang et al.’s interferometric experiment disproves the special theory of relativity by revealing that simultaneity must be an absolute concept independent of the observer’s state of motion, is based on circular reasoning and therefore constitutes a logical fallacy.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comment on “Entangled Simultaneity: Testing Lorentz and Light Speed Invariance with Quantum and Classical Entanglement”

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月16日

查看全文
  • Justo Pastor Lambare

摘要

In this comment, we demonstrate that the claim by Spavieri et al., asserting that Wang et al.’s interferometric experiment disproves the special theory of relativity by revealing that simultaneity must be an absolute concept independent of the observer’s state of motion, is based on circular reasoning and therefore constitutes a logical fallacy.