<p>Educational robotics offers opportunities to young learners in early childhood settings (three to nine years) to learn with robots, whether screen-free or screen-based. Due to the vast variety of educational robotics tools available, educational practitioners need decision support to choose appropriate tools. The task of finding, acquiring and using educational robotics tools for early childhood settings is influenced by material and usage access issues associated with the digital divide. This article presents the findings obtained during an action research study, which involved semi-structured interviews with seven research participants, observations, and the researcher’s action research journal as data gathering&#xa0;instruments. The findings are interpreted through the lens of two theories, namely the types of access associated with the digital divide, and the Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge framework. Ten tools for early childhood settings were investigated. This article provides eight practical considerations, three sets of overarching educational robotics tool characteristics, and three categories for decision support when choosing appropriate educational robotics tools.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Supporting Choices for Educational Robotics Tools for Early Childhood Settings: Considerations, Characteristics, and Categories

  • Annèl van Rooyen,
  • Ronel Callaghan

摘要

Educational robotics offers opportunities to young learners in early childhood settings (three to nine years) to learn with robots, whether screen-free or screen-based. Due to the vast variety of educational robotics tools available, educational practitioners need decision support to choose appropriate tools. The task of finding, acquiring and using educational robotics tools for early childhood settings is influenced by material and usage access issues associated with the digital divide. This article presents the findings obtained during an action research study, which involved semi-structured interviews with seven research participants, observations, and the researcher’s action research journal as data gathering instruments. The findings are interpreted through the lens of two theories, namely the types of access associated with the digital divide, and the Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge framework. Ten tools for early childhood settings were investigated. This article provides eight practical considerations, three sets of overarching educational robotics tool characteristics, and three categories for decision support when choosing appropriate educational robotics tools.