Scholarlink

<p>Urban rivers are altered by anthropogenic disturbances reshaping instream habitat structure. Plastic pollution is increasingly prevalent in these systems, yet its ecological role remains unclear; it may provide, smother, or alter habitat complexity. Here, we investigated how macroplastic (&gt; 5&#xa0;mm) functions as habitat for macroinvertebrates in the Lower Los Angeles River, USA. We quantified anthropogenic litter including macroplastic and streamwood, and sampled macroinvertebrates from five macroplastic (shopping bags, drink bottles, foam fragments, hard fragments, fabric) and three natural substrates (vegetation, streamwood, processed wood) across three reaches at a single timepoint. Macroplastic exceeded streamwood in abundance (macroplastic:0.04–1.41m<sup>2</sup>; streamwood:0.01–0.34m<sup>2</sup>) and cumulative surface area (macroplastic:0.91–31.76m<sup>2</sup>; streamwood:0.45–2.61m<sup>2</sup>), suggesting that macroplastic is the dominant habitat in this modified ecosystem. Macroinvertebrate density did not differ between macroplastics and natural substrates, and abundance increased with item surface area regardless of material type. Macroinvertebrate community composition was dominated by tolerant taxa such as Chironomidae and Oligochaeta, and diversity did not differ between substrate types but differed between floating or benthic substrates. These findings suggest that macroplastic may function as habitat structure comparable to natural materials in the Los Angeles River; however, consequences remain unclear. Management strategies that remove macroplastic should also consider the potential impacts of this habitat loss.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Plastic pollution is habitat in urban rivers: a case study in the Lower Los Angeles River, CA, USA

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年8月4日

查看全文
  • Jacob Haney,
  • Chelsea M. Rochman,
  • Andrew B. Gray

摘要

Urban rivers are altered by anthropogenic disturbances reshaping instream habitat structure. Plastic pollution is increasingly prevalent in these systems, yet its ecological role remains unclear; it may provide, smother, or alter habitat complexity. Here, we investigated how macroplastic (> 5 mm) functions as habitat for macroinvertebrates in the Lower Los Angeles River, USA. We quantified anthropogenic litter including macroplastic and streamwood, and sampled macroinvertebrates from five macroplastic (shopping bags, drink bottles, foam fragments, hard fragments, fabric) and three natural substrates (vegetation, streamwood, processed wood) across three reaches at a single timepoint. Macroplastic exceeded streamwood in abundance (macroplastic:0.04–1.41m2; streamwood:0.01–0.34m2) and cumulative surface area (macroplastic:0.91–31.76m2; streamwood:0.45–2.61m2), suggesting that macroplastic is the dominant habitat in this modified ecosystem. Macroinvertebrate density did not differ between macroplastics and natural substrates, and abundance increased with item surface area regardless of material type. Macroinvertebrate community composition was dominated by tolerant taxa such as Chironomidae and Oligochaeta, and diversity did not differ between substrate types but differed between floating or benthic substrates. These findings suggest that macroplastic may function as habitat structure comparable to natural materials in the Los Angeles River; however, consequences remain unclear. Management strategies that remove macroplastic should also consider the potential impacts of this habitat loss.