Scholarlink

<p>The ecological implications of macroplastic accumulation in rivers, particularly their role as artificial substrates for aquatic organisms, remain poorly understood, especially in the Afrotropical streams. We investigated how macroinvertebrates colonise macroplastic substrates relative to natural substrates in four minimally disturbed headwater stream sites in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Experimental substrate groups, including NS (100% natural substrate), NP (1:1 mix of natural and plastic substrates), and PD (100% plastic substrate), were deployed for 180&#xa0;days. Macroinvertebrates colonised macroplastics and natural substrates, and overall community structure did not differ significantly amongst the substrate groups. However, the natural substrate supported higher taxonomic richness (41) than the macroplastic substrate (33). Temporal variation strongly influenced macroinvertebrate community assemblage, with colonisation significantly increasing over time, across all substrate groups. Taxon-specific preferences were also evident: macroinvertebrate taxa such as Glossosomatidae, Psephenidae, and Veliidae showed positive associations with plastic substrates, whereas Libellulidae, Tipulidae, and Tabanidae preferred natural substrates. These findings suggest that macroplastics serve as suitable artificial substrates for aquatic macroinvertebrates, but their ecological importance varies amongst taxa. Natural substrates still supported a higher number of taxa, though not statistically significant, underscoring the importance of preserving naturally occurring substrates as key habitats for freshwater biodiversity.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Macroplastics as artificial substrates for macroinvertebrates in four subtropical river systems in the Eastern Cape, South Africa

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年8月4日

查看全文
  • Andrew A. Ali,
  • Chika F. Nnadozie,
  • Frank C. Akamagwuna,
  • Victoria I. Chukwuemeka,
  • Unique N. Keke,
  • Oghenekaro N. Odume

摘要

The ecological implications of macroplastic accumulation in rivers, particularly their role as artificial substrates for aquatic organisms, remain poorly understood, especially in the Afrotropical streams. We investigated how macroinvertebrates colonise macroplastic substrates relative to natural substrates in four minimally disturbed headwater stream sites in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Experimental substrate groups, including NS (100% natural substrate), NP (1:1 mix of natural and plastic substrates), and PD (100% plastic substrate), were deployed for 180 days. Macroinvertebrates colonised macroplastics and natural substrates, and overall community structure did not differ significantly amongst the substrate groups. However, the natural substrate supported higher taxonomic richness (41) than the macroplastic substrate (33). Temporal variation strongly influenced macroinvertebrate community assemblage, with colonisation significantly increasing over time, across all substrate groups. Taxon-specific preferences were also evident: macroinvertebrate taxa such as Glossosomatidae, Psephenidae, and Veliidae showed positive associations with plastic substrates, whereas Libellulidae, Tipulidae, and Tabanidae preferred natural substrates. These findings suggest that macroplastics serve as suitable artificial substrates for aquatic macroinvertebrates, but their ecological importance varies amongst taxa. Natural substrates still supported a higher number of taxa, though not statistically significant, underscoring the importance of preserving naturally occurring substrates as key habitats for freshwater biodiversity.