<p>This article contributes to phenomenological sociology by establishing a dialogue between Hermann Schmitz’s “new phenomenology” and Erving Goffman’s microsociology. The focus is on synthesizing the two authors’ central scholarly themes: in Schmitz’s work, <i>feelings as atmospheres</i>; in Goffman’s, the <i>interaction order</i>. The text demonstrates that neo-phenomenological sociology, drawing on Schmitz and Goffman, is a microsociological approach centered on atmospheres—an object unknown in classical phenomenological sociology (Schütz and his successors). Because atmospheres are the product, shaper, and stabilizer of and a threat to any microsocial situation, the interaction order always proves to be an <i>atmosphere order</i> as well. A phenomenological sociology based on Schmitz and Goffman thus simultaneously corrects the activist bias of the sociological tradition and points to the fundamentally pathic dimension of the social.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The Atmosphere Order: A Dialogue Between Hermann Schmitz and Erving Goffman

  • Robert Gugutzer

摘要

This article contributes to phenomenological sociology by establishing a dialogue between Hermann Schmitz’s “new phenomenology” and Erving Goffman’s microsociology. The focus is on synthesizing the two authors’ central scholarly themes: in Schmitz’s work, feelings as atmospheres; in Goffman’s, the interaction order. The text demonstrates that neo-phenomenological sociology, drawing on Schmitz and Goffman, is a microsociological approach centered on atmospheres—an object unknown in classical phenomenological sociology (Schütz and his successors). Because atmospheres are the product, shaper, and stabilizer of and a threat to any microsocial situation, the interaction order always proves to be an atmosphere order as well. A phenomenological sociology based on Schmitz and Goffman thus simultaneously corrects the activist bias of the sociological tradition and points to the fundamentally pathic dimension of the social.