Scholarlink

<p>Recently, a counter-argument has been presented regarding the invalidity of the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph (PBR) theorem (Cabbolet, Found. Phys. <b>53</b>, 64 <CitationRef CitationID="CR1">2023</CitationRef>). This claim has sparked a debate, with some authors defending the PBR theorem (Hofer-Szabó, Found. Phys. <b>54</b>, 36 <CitationRef CitationID="CR2">2024</CitationRef>), but the proponent of the claim has insisted on his argument (Cabbolet, Found. Phys. 54, 69 <CitationRef CitationID="CR3">2024</CitationRef>; Cabbolet, Found. Phys. <b>54</b>, 48 <CitationRef CitationID="CR4">2024</CitationRef>). Moreover, the author claimed to have proved that the PBR theorem is incorrect by a generic counterexample (Cabbolet, Found. Phys. <b>54</b>, 48 <CitationRef CitationID="CR4">2024</CitationRef>). In this paper, we contribute to the discussion with some new arguments. We demonstrate that the PBR theorem contains no errors and remains intact.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A Discussion on the Validity of the PBR Theorem

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年8月1日

查看全文
  • İnanç Şahin,
  • Gazi Alumur

摘要

Recently, a counter-argument has been presented regarding the invalidity of the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph (PBR) theorem (Cabbolet, Found. Phys. 53, 64 2023). This claim has sparked a debate, with some authors defending the PBR theorem (Hofer-Szabó, Found. Phys. 54, 36 2024), but the proponent of the claim has insisted on his argument (Cabbolet, Found. Phys. 54, 69 2024; Cabbolet, Found. Phys. 54, 48 2024). Moreover, the author claimed to have proved that the PBR theorem is incorrect by a generic counterexample (Cabbolet, Found. Phys. 54, 48 2024). In this paper, we contribute to the discussion with some new arguments. We demonstrate that the PBR theorem contains no errors and remains intact.