Scholarlink

<p>Theory posits that warning signals should converge phenotypically to reinforce predator memory, yet many aposematic species show substantial variation in warning signals within and between populations. This could be explained by alternative selective pressures on phenotype beyond predation such as thermoregulation, but empirical tests are scarce and do not consider the full spectrum of sunlight. To examine whether trade-offs with thermoregulation could explain variation in warning colouration, we examined thermal properties of colour variants of the aposematic cotton harlequin bug (<i>Tectocoris diophthalmus</i>). This species shows striking variation in warning signals: it is sexually dichromatic, varies within sexes, and shows clinal variation in colour frequencies, with iridescent blue-green colouration prevalent in cooler climates and non-iridescent red–orange colouration prevalent in warmer climates. We quantified reflectivity between colour variants over the full solar spectrum and investigated the contribution of ultraviolet and visible (UV–visible, 300–700&#xa0;nm) and near infrared (NIR, 700–1700&#xa0;nm) light on heating. Differences in reflectivity of iridescent and non-iridescent colour patches were greater in NIR than UV–visible wavelengths but did not result in significant differences in heating. However, we found a tight link between body size and reflectivity, with smaller males having lower reflectivity and heating faster. Due to the strong correlation between body size and colouration, thermal constraints related to body size may help to explain the observed clinal variation in colour frequencies.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Body size rather than reflectivity explains thermal constraints on colour variation in an aposematic jewel bug

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月27日

查看全文
  • Kei-Lin M. Ooi,
  • Iliana Medina,
  • Fabian C. Salgado-Roa,
  • Devi Stuart-Fox

摘要

Theory posits that warning signals should converge phenotypically to reinforce predator memory, yet many aposematic species show substantial variation in warning signals within and between populations. This could be explained by alternative selective pressures on phenotype beyond predation such as thermoregulation, but empirical tests are scarce and do not consider the full spectrum of sunlight. To examine whether trade-offs with thermoregulation could explain variation in warning colouration, we examined thermal properties of colour variants of the aposematic cotton harlequin bug (Tectocoris diophthalmus). This species shows striking variation in warning signals: it is sexually dichromatic, varies within sexes, and shows clinal variation in colour frequencies, with iridescent blue-green colouration prevalent in cooler climates and non-iridescent red–orange colouration prevalent in warmer climates. We quantified reflectivity between colour variants over the full solar spectrum and investigated the contribution of ultraviolet and visible (UV–visible, 300–700 nm) and near infrared (NIR, 700–1700 nm) light on heating. Differences in reflectivity of iridescent and non-iridescent colour patches were greater in NIR than UV–visible wavelengths but did not result in significant differences in heating. However, we found a tight link between body size and reflectivity, with smaller males having lower reflectivity and heating faster. Due to the strong correlation between body size and colouration, thermal constraints related to body size may help to explain the observed clinal variation in colour frequencies.