Scholarlink

<p>Contemporary efforts to naturalize teleology typically locate intrinsic purposiveness in the self-organizing dynamics of far-from-equilibrium biological systems, most prominently within the organizational account of biological autonomy. This paper argues that this strategy remains incomplete insofar as it treats <i>material embodiment</i> in a theoretically loose manner. While “ascent” to abstraction buys generality, it also fuels the familiar <i>liberality objection</i>: on purely formal criteria alone, intuitively non-teleological systems (e.g., candle flames, dust devils, Rayleigh–Bénard convection) can appear to qualify as teleological. I propose that the missing discriminant is <i>materiality</i> rather than, or in addition to, organization: whether a system’s far-from-equilibrium dynamics are sustained intrinsically depends on the specific energy-transducing media that compose it. Developing this claim requires diagnosing a lingering Kantian inheritance in contemporary teleology debates—an implicit conception of matter as inert, passive, and causally “external,” which encourages a methodological mistrust of materiality. Against this background, I introduce active matter physics (AMP) as a post-Kantian corrective: active matter systems locally convert environmental energy into work, thereby maintaining sustained non-equilibrium organization in ways passive dissipative structures cannot. There are two corresponding upshots of this: the first is meta-theoretical, that updating the ‘physical’ within physicalism does not <i>ipso facto</i> translate to an updating of the ‘material’ and materialism—the latter requiring an expansion of theoretical armature to include the resource of AMP. Second, what I propose follows from this is a “materiality of immanence” that strengthens naturalized teleology by grounding purposiveness in the system’s own material dynamics, and by providing principled resources for separating genuinely teleological organization from merely transient self-organization.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Rethinking the Nature of Matter: Active Matter Physics and the Naturalisation of Teleology

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月19日

查看全文
  • David Jacob Harrison

摘要

Contemporary efforts to naturalize teleology typically locate intrinsic purposiveness in the self-organizing dynamics of far-from-equilibrium biological systems, most prominently within the organizational account of biological autonomy. This paper argues that this strategy remains incomplete insofar as it treats material embodiment in a theoretically loose manner. While “ascent” to abstraction buys generality, it also fuels the familiar liberality objection: on purely formal criteria alone, intuitively non-teleological systems (e.g., candle flames, dust devils, Rayleigh–Bénard convection) can appear to qualify as teleological. I propose that the missing discriminant is materiality rather than, or in addition to, organization: whether a system’s far-from-equilibrium dynamics are sustained intrinsically depends on the specific energy-transducing media that compose it. Developing this claim requires diagnosing a lingering Kantian inheritance in contemporary teleology debates—an implicit conception of matter as inert, passive, and causally “external,” which encourages a methodological mistrust of materiality. Against this background, I introduce active matter physics (AMP) as a post-Kantian corrective: active matter systems locally convert environmental energy into work, thereby maintaining sustained non-equilibrium organization in ways passive dissipative structures cannot. There are two corresponding upshots of this: the first is meta-theoretical, that updating the ‘physical’ within physicalism does not ipso facto translate to an updating of the ‘material’ and materialism—the latter requiring an expansion of theoretical armature to include the resource of AMP. Second, what I propose follows from this is a “materiality of immanence” that strengthens naturalized teleology by grounding purposiveness in the system’s own material dynamics, and by providing principled resources for separating genuinely teleological organization from merely transient self-organization.