<p>Radon is an established lung carcinogen, but more research is needed to inform whether area-based measures of radon exposure reflect underlying cancer risk. This study, the first of its kind in the UK, aimed to investigate the association between a nationwide indicative radon atlas and lung cancer risk in Northern Ireland, a region in which lung cancer screening programmes are under design. A population-based case–control study was conducted. Primary lung cancer cases (<i>n</i> = 1,687) from the Northern Ireland Cancer Registry diagnosed in 2006 and 2014 were compared with 8,094 non-lung cancer controls from a large cohort. Radon exposure data were extracted from the Indicative Atlas of Radon, which categorises 1 km<sup>2</sup> areas by the percentage of households exceeding 200&#xa0;Bq/m<sup>3</sup>. Exposure data were linked to participants by postcode. Logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, deprivation and PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for lung cancer. Individuals residing in high radon exposure areas (Atlas Class 6) had a greater than two-fold lung cancer risk (adjusted OR: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.25, 3.92) compared to residents in all other areas. This association was revealed after adjusting for PM<sub>2.5</sub>. This study supports the utility of an indicative radon atlas in reflecting underlying population lung cancer risk associated with radon, while highlighting constraints inherent to atlas-based exposure classification and secondary data.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Lung cancer risk in relation to indicative radon atlas metrics in Northern Ireland: a population-based case–control study using secondary data

  • Claire M. Delargy,
  • Helen G. Coleman,
  • Quentin G. Crowley,
  • Damien Bennett,
  • Javier Elio,
  • Deirdre Fitzpatrick,
  • Helen Mitchell,
  • Sara M. Wallace,
  • Rawan A. N. Alhattab,
  • Angela Scott,
  • Bernadette McGuinness,
  • Ruth F. Hunter,
  • Gareth J. McKay,
  • Daniel R. S. Middleton

摘要

Radon is an established lung carcinogen, but more research is needed to inform whether area-based measures of radon exposure reflect underlying cancer risk. This study, the first of its kind in the UK, aimed to investigate the association between a nationwide indicative radon atlas and lung cancer risk in Northern Ireland, a region in which lung cancer screening programmes are under design. A population-based case–control study was conducted. Primary lung cancer cases (n = 1,687) from the Northern Ireland Cancer Registry diagnosed in 2006 and 2014 were compared with 8,094 non-lung cancer controls from a large cohort. Radon exposure data were extracted from the Indicative Atlas of Radon, which categorises 1 km2 areas by the percentage of households exceeding 200 Bq/m3. Exposure data were linked to participants by postcode. Logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, deprivation and PM2.5 exposure were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for lung cancer. Individuals residing in high radon exposure areas (Atlas Class 6) had a greater than two-fold lung cancer risk (adjusted OR: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.25, 3.92) compared to residents in all other areas. This association was revealed after adjusting for PM2.5. This study supports the utility of an indicative radon atlas in reflecting underlying population lung cancer risk associated with radon, while highlighting constraints inherent to atlas-based exposure classification and secondary data.