<p>Edelsbrunner et al.&#xa0;<i>Educational Psychology Review,</i> <i>37</i>, 1–43, <CitationRef CitationID="CR12">2025</CitationRef> recently published a systematic review and meta-analysis of Cronbach's alphas in domain-specific knowledge tests. While appreciating their analysis and agreeing with most findings, we disagree with three messages regarding the use of alpha in knowledge tests: (1) alpha measures the strength of interrelations among items, (2) a low alpha indicates validity, and (3) thresholds for alpha be abandoned. We discuss these messages in a constructive manner and present a way to counteract the inflation of seemingly high alphas in educational psychology.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Why We Might Still be Concerned About Low Cronbach’s Alphas in Domain-specific Knowledge Tests

  • Steffen Zitzmann,
  • Gabe A. Orona

摘要

Edelsbrunner et al. Educational Psychology Review, 37, 1–43, 2025 recently published a systematic review and meta-analysis of Cronbach's alphas in domain-specific knowledge tests. While appreciating their analysis and agreeing with most findings, we disagree with three messages regarding the use of alpha in knowledge tests: (1) alpha measures the strength of interrelations among items, (2) a low alpha indicates validity, and (3) thresholds for alpha be abandoned. We discuss these messages in a constructive manner and present a way to counteract the inflation of seemingly high alphas in educational psychology.