Scholarlink

<p>The escalation of global conflicts necessitates robust pedagogical frameworks capable of ensuring academic continuity and human development. This article validates the Humanitarian Digital Pedagogy Model, an innovative framework that integrates technological innovation with human-centered values to sustain inclusive schooling under wartime conditions. Drawing on mixed-method research conducted in Ukraine (2020–2024), the study empirically assesses the model’s effectiveness in supporting psychological resilience, relational cohesion, and academic involvement during the full-scale military conflict in Ukraine. The analysis utilizes a comparative design, examining differences between participants (Experimental Group) and non-participants (Control Group). Four component indices—Academic Involvement (AI), Psychological Involvement (PI), Relational Interaction (RI), and Teacher Involvement (TI)—were synthesized into a composite Efficiency Index (EI). Results show that students and teachers engaged in the model significantly outperformed non-participants, demonstrating an average gain of 12–15% across all measured indices. The findings confirm that digital tools, when grounded in empathy, moral agency, and solidarity, can transform education from mere knowledge transmission into a crucial instrument for survival and post-conflict recovery. Implications are discussed for developing global pedagogical resilience and reforming education in conflict-affected regions.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Integration of humanitarian and digital pedagogical approaches: an empirical analysis of the impact on student resilience and engagement in a conflict zone (Ukraine)

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月29日

查看全文
  • Artem Kyianovskyi

摘要

The escalation of global conflicts necessitates robust pedagogical frameworks capable of ensuring academic continuity and human development. This article validates the Humanitarian Digital Pedagogy Model, an innovative framework that integrates technological innovation with human-centered values to sustain inclusive schooling under wartime conditions. Drawing on mixed-method research conducted in Ukraine (2020–2024), the study empirically assesses the model’s effectiveness in supporting psychological resilience, relational cohesion, and academic involvement during the full-scale military conflict in Ukraine. The analysis utilizes a comparative design, examining differences between participants (Experimental Group) and non-participants (Control Group). Four component indices—Academic Involvement (AI), Psychological Involvement (PI), Relational Interaction (RI), and Teacher Involvement (TI)—were synthesized into a composite Efficiency Index (EI). Results show that students and teachers engaged in the model significantly outperformed non-participants, demonstrating an average gain of 12–15% across all measured indices. The findings confirm that digital tools, when grounded in empathy, moral agency, and solidarity, can transform education from mere knowledge transmission into a crucial instrument for survival and post-conflict recovery. Implications are discussed for developing global pedagogical resilience and reforming education in conflict-affected regions.